There is strong support for the view that children growing up in lowâincome homes typically evince poorer performance on tests of inhibitory control compared to those growing up in higher income homes. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the work documenting this association has been conducted in highâincome countries. It is not yet known whether the mechanisms found to mediate this association would generalize to children in lowâ and middleâincome countries, where the risks of exposure to extreme poverty and a wide range of both biological and psychosocial hazards may be greater. We examined relations among early adversity, neural correlates of inhibitory control, and cognitive outcomes in 154 5âyearâold children living in Dhaka, Bangladesh, an area with a high prevalence of poverty. Participants completed a go/noâgo task assessing inhibitory control and their behavioral and eventârelated potential responses were assessed. Cortical source analysis was performed. We collected measures of poverty, malnutrition, maternal mental health, psychosocial adversity, and cognitive skills. Supporting studies in highâincome countries, children in this sample exhibited a longer N2 latency and higher P3 amplitude to the noâgo versus go condition. Unexpectedly, children had a more pronounced N2 amplitude during go trials than noâgo trials. The N2 latency was related to their behavioral accuracy on the go/noâgo task. The P3 mean amplitude, behavioral accuracy, and reaction time during the task were all associated with intelligenceâquotient (IQ) scores. Children who experienced higher levels of psychosocial adversity had lower accuracy on the task and lower IQ scores.