2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AstroSat view of MAXI J1535−571: broad-band spectro-temporal features

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 (bottom panels) shows how the broadband noise can be well fitted by two Lorentzians centered at ≈0.5 Hz and ≈5 Hz, respectively, while a type-C QPO (Casella et al 2005;Motta et al 2015) and its second harmonic are clearly detected at ≈2.25 Hz and 4.5 Hz. These values are consistent with the values measured from quasisimultaneous Astrosat X-ray timing observations (Bhargava et al 2019;Sreehari et al 2019). Results from the fit are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: X-ray and Near-ir Power Spectral Densitiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2 (bottom panels) shows how the broadband noise can be well fitted by two Lorentzians centered at ≈0.5 Hz and ≈5 Hz, respectively, while a type-C QPO (Casella et al 2005;Motta et al 2015) and its second harmonic are clearly detected at ≈2.25 Hz and 4.5 Hz. These values are consistent with the values measured from quasisimultaneous Astrosat X-ray timing observations (Bhargava et al 2019;Sreehari et al 2019). Results from the fit are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: X-ray and Near-ir Power Spectral Densitiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…where the disc component dominates) and the X-ray variability decreases, reaching fractional rms amplitudes < 5 per cent. It is worth noting that quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) were detected during the main outburst of J1535 (Mereminskiy et al 2018;Stevens et al 2018;Huang et al 2018;Stiele & Kong 2018;Shang et al 2019;Sreehari et al 2019), however, we did not detect any significant QPO during the reflares. This result could potentially be related to differences in the physical conditions during the normal bright outburst and the fainter reflares or it could be that QPOs are too weak to be detected at the low count rates we ob-serve.…”
Section: Outburst Reflares Of Maxi J1535-571: the State Transition Identificationcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The absorption column density is around 5 × 10 22 cm −2 for all the segments. Sreehari et al (2019) and Sridhar et al (2019) report a slightly lower value for the same observation. The difference in the N H is arising due to a difference in the ancillary response file (ARF) of SXT used by different authors.…”
Section: Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%