2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62880-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric participation of defenders and critics of vaccines to debates on French-speaking Twitter

Abstract: For more than a decade, doubt about vaccines has become an increasingly important global issue. Polarization of opinions on this matter, especially through social media, has been repeatedly observed, but details about the balance of forces are left unclear. In this paper, we analyse the flow of information on vaccines on the French-speaking realm of Twitter between 2016 and 2017. Two major asymmetries appear. Rather than opposing themselves on each vaccine, defenders and critics focus on different vaccines and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The streaming collection consists of a random sample of tweets that contain any of the specific keywords promoting strong antivaccination sentiments. This is a common method used to collect Twitter data on vaccination hesitancy and other similar topics [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. It is well understood by academics and is often used to provide useful insights about the chatter on the web about a particular topic in a specific period.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The streaming collection consists of a random sample of tweets that contain any of the specific keywords promoting strong antivaccination sentiments. This is a common method used to collect Twitter data on vaccination hesitancy and other similar topics [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. It is well understood by academics and is often used to provide useful insights about the chatter on the web about a particular topic in a specific period.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 3% more negative posts than positive ones. In an analysis of French-language Twitter posts, Gargiulo et al noted greater activity of posters expressing anti-vaccination views than those with a positive attitude [ 24 ]. This was also observed in a study of the degree of polarization of the sentiment towards vaccination among Facebook users posting in English [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of vaccine-related content available on social media platforms have been conducted in the world. Those analyses are based on data extracted from social media platforms and examine vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, sentiment and administrative burden [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Study data acquisition from Facebook and Twitter commonly relies on automated IT solutions offering data collection, monitoring and analysis [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…#moderna and #pfizer). As we noticed in a previous paper [9], the vaccine-critical galaxy has a marked capacity to capitalize on hashtag use in order to be easily retrieved in keyword searches. The large use of these hashtags by a community implies that a user looking for information on a particular vaccine, has a higher probability to reach contents from this community.…”
Section: The Hyper-graph Structure and Mesoscopic Shape Of The Debate...mentioning
confidence: 90%