2015
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetry in Price Transmission in Agricultural Markets

Abstract: This paper explores the asymmetries in price transmission from international to local markets. We expect the presence of large intermediaries in agricultural markets to lead to a stronger price transmission when international prices decline than when they rise. The empirical evidence confirms the presence of asymmetric price transmission consistent with the presence of large intermediaries with monopsony power.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Market power is often assumed to be a potential explanation for asymmetric price behavior (Moorthy, ). McLaren () show evidence of pricing asymmetries between international and domestic prices in the presence of strong monopsony power of agricultural intermediaries. Specifically, he finds that as international price falls, local prices fall proportionally more than when international prices increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market power is often assumed to be a potential explanation for asymmetric price behavior (Moorthy, ). McLaren () show evidence of pricing asymmetries between international and domestic prices in the presence of strong monopsony power of agricultural intermediaries. Specifically, he finds that as international price falls, local prices fall proportionally more than when international prices increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for policy makers to act, they must first understand the underlying causes of asymmetric transmission in Vidarbha cotton markets. The literature outlines two possibilities ‐ disproportionate market power (Acharya et al., ; Borenstein et al., ; Kinnucan and Forker, ; Mclaren, ; Powers, ) and/or inappropriate market structure (Peltzman, ; Ward, ).…”
Section: Implications Of Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tifaoui and von Cramon‐Taubadel () recently investigated the impact of the temporary sale price (TSP) on PT for butter in Germany, arguing that the “valleys” generated from TSP increase the speed and asymmetry of vertical PT. Recently, McLaren () developed a theoretical framework to explain the existence of asymmetric price dynamics if there exist sufficiently convex marginal cost curves for market intermediaries, consistent with the monopsony power exerted by them. Investigating the relation between export intermediaries and farmers for a broad range of agricultural products and countries, he found that decreases in farm prices are far more completely passed to Free On Board (FOB) prices than increases.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may expect the latter to exert market power and the so‐called “rocket and feather” dynamics to occur (i.e., food‐processor price increases are more fully and quickly transmitted to retail prices). According to McLaren (), the relation between retailer and industrial processor at the optimum can be specified as Pr¯=wfalse(trueQ¯false)=wfalse[trueQ¯(Pp)false],where Q¯false(Ppfalse) is the processors’ supply function, with Q(Pp)>0 and Q(Pp)0, w(Q¯) the inverse supply function of retailers, with w(Q¯)>0 and w(Q¯)0, and Pr¯,Q¯the retail price and quantity maximizing the profit, respectively (for the detailed methodology and derivation, see McLaren, ). The retail price is treated as exogenous, whereas the processor price is considered endogenous.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation