2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric radionuclides transported to Fukuoka, Japan remote from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power complex following the nuclear accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
32
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The two cases also have very close SR values (the SR of GP4 is 28 and that of GP3 is 27). Since there were no simulations with intermediate gaseous fractions, the results can only indicate that the optimal gaseous fractions of 131 I lie somewhere between 30 or 60 % for the model setup in this study, which is also consistent with the result from the study by Momoshima et al (2012).…”
Section: The Influence Of Emission Rates and Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The two cases also have very close SR values (the SR of GP4 is 28 and that of GP3 is 27). Since there were no simulations with intermediate gaseous fractions, the results can only indicate that the optimal gaseous fractions of 131 I lie somewhere between 30 or 60 % for the model setup in this study, which is also consistent with the result from the study by Momoshima et al (2012).…”
Section: The Influence Of Emission Rates and Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Exposures in long-term individual doses were modeled through cloud shine and ground shine pathways, while the calculations for the long-term doses were modeled through ground shine pathway (via the food chain). The potential exposure situation for a nuclear reactor facility was not a typical accident affected by the fuel in the core which releases radioactive material to the environment [13]. Thus, the effects to the public and the types of consequences may be different.…”
Section: Fission Product Dispersion and Radiation Dose In The Environmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Comparison with calculated committed equivalent doses of Bronchial (BB) and a unity region of Alveolar-Interstitial (AI) and Bronchiolar (bb), associated with beta particles of Cs-134 and Cs-137, by PHITS and general standard method Cs-134:ˇ-particle (Sv/particles) Cs-137:ˇ-particle (Sv/particles) Type-F Type-M Type-S Type-F Type-M Type-S PHITS BB 1.62220E-11 2.18575E-08 4.03264E-08 1.71321E-11 1.06724E-06 7.89293E-06 AI+bb 7.15408E-12 6.32775E-08 2.40142E-07 8.40650E-12 8.73540E-08 6.46041E-07 General BB 4.21726E-10 4.60743E-07 6.01231E-07 5.86399E-10 6.60018E-07 9.03500E-07 standard method AI+bb 1.94080E-11 7.51489E-08 2.45339E-07 2.66325E-11 1.02437E-07 6.11277E-07 doses attributed to the gamma rays of Cs-134 and Cs-137 on the PHITS calculation results are entirely consistent with those of the general standard method at both the respiratory tracts of BB and AI+bb.…”
Section: Committed Equivalent Doses In Comparison Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few years after this accident, we had slightly understood some findings regarding all the radioactivity for released radioactive cesium isotopes of Cs-134 and Cs-137 into the environment and the exact migrations for the radioactive plumes including those radioactive materials upon atmospheric conditions [1][2][3][4][5]. Four years elapsed and it has now become clear that the radioactive materials have chemical and physical properties concerning chemical forms, particle sizes, shape, phases (gas or aerosol), water solubility, and residence time [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%