2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12029-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial Scar Segmentation via Potential Learning in the Graph-Cut Framework

Abstract: Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging (LGE MRI) emerges as a routine scan for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, due to the low image quality automating the quantification and analysis of the atrial scars is challenging. In this study, we proposed a fully automated method based on the graph-cut framework, where the potential of the graph is learned on a surface mesh of the left atrium (LA), using an equidistant projection and a deep neural network (DNN). For validation, we employ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have made neural networks the primary tool for image segmentation. A study by Li et al [15] proposed a method that combines CNN with graph-cut by using convolutional networks to derive weights for the graph-cut edges, treating the patch as a node centred on the atrial edge. This approach dramatically improves segmentation accuracy, especially when dealing with two targets that exhibit apparent data imbalance.…”
Section: Releated Work 21 Scar Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have made neural networks the primary tool for image segmentation. A study by Li et al [15] proposed a method that combines CNN with graph-cut by using convolutional networks to derive weights for the graph-cut edges, treating the patch as a node centred on the atrial edge. This approach dramatically improves segmentation accuracy, especially when dealing with two targets that exhibit apparent data imbalance.…”
Section: Releated Work 21 Scar Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al . [16] proposed a hybrid approach that combined a graph-cuts framework with CNNs for automatic scar segmentation, and extended their work with a multi-scale CNN to learn local and global features simultaneously. Chen et al .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [15] used superpixel over-segmentation for feature extraction and a supervised classification step via stacked sparse autoencoders for LA scar segmentation. Li et al [16] proposed a hybrid approach that combined a graph-cuts framework with CNNs for automatic scar segmentation, and extended their work with a multi-scale CNN to learn local and global features simultaneously. Chen et al [17] used multi-task learning for simultaneous LA and scar segmentation, but did not explicitly learn the spatial relationship between the two regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they only used handcrafted intensity features, which consisted of limited information. In contrast, Li et al (2018b) proposed a hybrid approach utilizing a graph-cuts framework combined with CNNs to predict edge weights of the graph for automatic scar segmentation. They extended their work by introducing multi-scale CNN (MS-CNN) to learn local and global features simultaneously (Li et al, 2020b).…”
Section: La Scar Segmentation and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned in Section 4.2.2 volume overlap measures (such as Dice) could be highly sensitive to the mismatch of small structures (namely scars here), so in instances it will impose disproportionate penalties on the algorithm. To mitigate the effect of small size of scars, Li et al (2020b) proposed to project the appearance of scars onto the LA surface for both ground truth and automatic segmentation results, and then calculate the Dice scores of scars on the projected LA surface instead of on the 3D volume (Wu et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018bLi et al, , 2020b. Furthermore, Li et al (2020b,a) computed the generalized Dice (GDice) of scars from the projected LA surface for more interpretation.…”
Section: La Scar Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%