2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/9716535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation Correction Effects in Rainfall Estimation at X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar: Evaluation with a Dense Rain Gauge Network

Abstract: The effects of attenuation correction in rainfall estimation with X-band dual-polarization radar were investigated with a dense rain gauge network. The calibration bias in reflectivity (ZH) was corrected using a self-consistency principle. The attenuation correction ofZHand the differential reflectivity (ZDR) were performed by a path integration method. After attenuation correction,ZHandZDRwere significantly improved, and their scatter plots matched well with the theoretical relationship betweenZHandZDR. The c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stratiform rainfall event that occurred from 19:21 LST on 2 May 2016 to 08:50 LST on 3 May 2016, was also analyzed to further assess the performance of the attenuation correction methods. The CTH was approximately 5 km (Figure 2e) in the study area and the RI was less 10 mm h −1 (Figure 3d); these results were consistent with the classification schemes [32], and the CT (Figure 3f) was "low cloud. "…”
Section: Reflectivity Of Convective and Stratiform Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A stratiform rainfall event that occurred from 19:21 LST on 2 May 2016 to 08:50 LST on 3 May 2016, was also analyzed to further assess the performance of the attenuation correction methods. The CTH was approximately 5 km (Figure 2e) in the study area and the RI was less 10 mm h −1 (Figure 3d); these results were consistent with the classification schemes [32], and the CT (Figure 3f) was "low cloud. "…”
Section: Reflectivity Of Convective and Stratiform Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Classification schemes using ground-based weather radar can identify [30] areas associated with the bright band [31]. Simple classification schemes (those that provide a threshold for radar reflectivity and the rainfall rate) are used to separate convective rainfall (≥40 dBZ or ≥10 mm h −1 ) from stratiform rainfall (<40 dBZ or <10 mm h −1 ) [32], where convective rainfall cases show rapid spatial and temporal variations with spatial heterogeneity. COMS data are also used to compare convective rainfall and stratiform rainfall.…”
Section: Reflectivity Of Convective and Stratiform Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the particles inside the weather clutter, the signal is attenuated as it propagates through the clutter. For long-range propagation, the attenuation effect may be significant, especially in the X-band [18,19]. The weather clutter was highly inhomogeneous, so the attenuation was strongly dependent on the signal path inside the clutter.…”
Section: Signal Amplitude and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrections for the attenuation effects of Z and Z dr have been studied intensively, especially in relation to C-band radars [19]- [21]. The specific differential phase (K dp , • km −1 ) has been extensively used for attenuation correction for several reasons; K dp remains unaffected by attenuation and radar power calibration and is less sensitive to the natural variability of the drop size distribution (DSD) [22]. The relationship of K dp − A h and K dp − A dp is approximately linear [14], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where dp is the increments of observed dp and the coefficients of α and β are in dB ( • ) −1 [11], [24]. These coefficients are sensitive to the variability of the DSD, radar wavelength, temperature, season, and precipitation type [22], [23], [25], [26]. For instance, [26] indicated that the coefficients of the A h − K dp (A dp − K dp ) relation of the X-band radar vary greatly from 0.14 to 0.34 (0.11 to 0.17) dB ( • ) −1 as a result of temperature changes and different drop deformation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%