2016
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1564-16.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of Responses to Self-Generated Sounds in Auditory Cortical Neurons

Abstract: Many of the sounds that we perceive are caused by our own actions, for example when speaking or moving, and must be distinguished from sounds caused by external events. Studies using macroscopic measurements of brain activity in human subjects have consistently shown that responses to self-generated sounds are attenuated in amplitude. However, the underlying manifestation of this phenomenon at the cellular level is not well understood. To address this, we recorded the activity of neurons in the auditory cortex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
94
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
20
94
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to interpret the suppression of sensory responses in auditory cortex for rhythmic distractors is within the predictive-coding framework, which posits that evoked response for predictable stimuli are reduced, reflecting a smaller prediction-error (Lange 2009;Bastos et al 2012;van Atteveldt et al 2015;Rummell et al 2016;Sherwell et al 2017;Friston 2019). According to this interpretation, the effects of predictability on sensory encoding of sounds that are to-be-ignored, are qualitatively similar to previously reported effect of for attended sounds (Sherwell et al 2017).…”
Section: Neural Encoding Of Rhythmic Distractorssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…One way to interpret the suppression of sensory responses in auditory cortex for rhythmic distractors is within the predictive-coding framework, which posits that evoked response for predictable stimuli are reduced, reflecting a smaller prediction-error (Lange 2009;Bastos et al 2012;van Atteveldt et al 2015;Rummell et al 2016;Sherwell et al 2017;Friston 2019). According to this interpretation, the effects of predictability on sensory encoding of sounds that are to-be-ignored, are qualitatively similar to previously reported effect of for attended sounds (Sherwell et al 2017).…”
Section: Neural Encoding Of Rhythmic Distractorssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Overall, stimuli that are expected evoke a reduced neural response. This pattern has been observed when stimuli are validly predicted by a preceding, arbitrarily paired, stimulus [65][66][67][68][69], when stimuli comply with a higher-order pattern such as a shape or scene [33,34], or when stimuli are the predictable result of an animal's own actions [70]. This phenomenon, termed expectation suppression [64,68,71], is present even when lowlevel adaption is controlled for and has been consistently found across modalities such as vision [65][66][67][72][73][74] and audition [68,69,75,76].…”
Section: How Do Expectations Modulate Sensory Processing?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, CD signals are not only critical for the discrimination of self‐produced versus externally generated sounds, but they also enable higher level functions such as learning of acoustic behavior, speech, and music across species by suppressing auditory responses to movement‐related stimulation . Auditory cortical neuron attenuation has been observed at the single‐cell and circuit level using optogenetics in mice, providing important tools for our understanding of neural circuit dysfunction in diseases such as schizophrenia …”
Section: Function Of Sensory Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%