2014
DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2014.873310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attractiveness Analysis of European Tourist Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there is no consensus in the literature with respect to the number of nights in a destination for a trip to be considered a city break. Whereas Fache (1994) defines it as a trip lasting between one and three nights, Valls, Sureda, and Valls-Tuñon (2014) distinguish between city breaks, short and long holidays, as those lasting 1---2 nights, 3---4 nights or 8 night stays or longer, respectively. Finally, Dunne et al (2010) include trips of 4---5 nights or longer.…”
Section: Main Features Of City Break Travelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, there is no consensus in the literature with respect to the number of nights in a destination for a trip to be considered a city break. Whereas Fache (1994) defines it as a trip lasting between one and three nights, Valls, Sureda, and Valls-Tuñon (2014) distinguish between city breaks, short and long holidays, as those lasting 1---2 nights, 3---4 nights or 8 night stays or longer, respectively. Finally, Dunne et al (2010) include trips of 4---5 nights or longer.…”
Section: Main Features Of City Break Travelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the reason of visit, there are not particularities in city breaks either. Part of the literature tends to be comprehensive, and includes holiday, cultural, business, health, sports, MICE (meetings, incentives, conferencing and exhibitions) or other as reasons for break-type, short or longer visits (Valls et al, 2014), whereas other studies feature these trips as ''national or international leisure breaks'' (Dunne et al 2010), or as nonbusiness trips (Fache, 1994). These procedural problems in terms of recognizing city break travels forced us to adopt a less restrictive view of the duration time, and a greater focus on a list of classification variables used as data-entry control, as we explain in the empirical research.…”
Section: Main Features Of City Break Travelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sheng (2010), cities may capitalize on their inherent quality and specificattractions, such as historical heritage sites and special landscapes, and convenient location for shopping and entertainment. The advantages of cities to become a touristic destination are also supported by the competitive advantage of the availability of infrastructure and facilities (Valls et al, 2014). That way, the development of tourism within a city can also support the expansion of the city in terms of the physical environment (Ismail and Baum, 2006).…”
Section: Snapshot Of Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, real "total attractiveness" must be considered from the (able of multiple perception) consumer -final customer point of view and interpreted in relation with specific and very impacting multi-polyhedric "responses" [19] to the consumer (in btoc). The complete set of every relevant (and well perceived ) component [20] (able to increase benefit for consumer and -possibly in co-valuing-value for consumer), must be considered and activated [21][22] [23].…”
Section: The Application Of Real "Total Attractiveness" In Destinatimentioning
confidence: 99%