2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1407-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augeninnendruckmessungen im Tages- und Nachtverlauf bei Glaukompatienten und Normalprobanden mittels Goldmann- und Perkins-Applanationstonometrie

Abstract: During diurnal IOP measurements in an upright position there were no statistically significant differences in IOP changes between groups. However, in a supine position IOP was significantly higher than in a sitting position and increased more in the glaucoma patients than in healthy controls. This observation might be due to a faulty regulation of the fluid shift in glaucoma patients and could cause progression of glaucomatous damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reclined position, OPP was estimated using the following formula: OPP reclining = MAP reclining — IOP reclining , where MAP reclining is the mean brachial artery blood pressure measured in the left arm with the subject reclining on the right side. 28 In a clinical trial comparing Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry, 29 IOP was approximately 1 mm Hg lower using Perkins compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry. Thus, any difference between Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry has minimal impact on the calculation of OPP reclining .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reclined position, OPP was estimated using the following formula: OPP reclining = MAP reclining — IOP reclining , where MAP reclining is the mean brachial artery blood pressure measured in the left arm with the subject reclining on the right side. 28 In a clinical trial comparing Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry, 29 IOP was approximately 1 mm Hg lower using Perkins compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry. Thus, any difference between Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry has minimal impact on the calculation of OPP reclining .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37] Furthermore, glaucoma patients exhibit a higher postural IOP dependence at high elevations 38 and at night. 39 Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is the gold standard in measuring IOP, 7,8 it has to be mounted to a slit-lamp biomicroscope, restricting its availability to hospitals and doctors' offices. This complicates and/or prevents its use in handicapped persons or patients with reduced motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the Perkins tonometer and GAT use the same principles of applanation tonometry, they share similar advantages and limitations. Their accuracy is similar, with a mean difference of 1.0 mmHg [ 12 , 13 ]. The Perkins tonometer also offers reasonable reliability, as shown in a study comparing several tonometers to GAT [ 14 ].…”
Section: Goldmann Applanation Tonometermentioning
confidence: 99%