2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs12010034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Georectification and Mosaicking of UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imagery from Push-Broom Sensors

Abstract: Hyperspectral systems integrated on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) provide unique opportunities to conduct high-resolution multitemporal spectral analysis for diverse applications. However, additional time-consuming rectification efforts in postprocessing are routinely required, since geometric distortions can be introduced due to UAV movements during flight, even if navigation/motion sensors are used to track the position of each scan. Part of the challenge in obtaining high-quality imagery relates to the lac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one was the emergence of laboratory and field hyperspectral acquisition equipment, such as LabSpec [5][6][7], TerraSpec [24,25] and Hylogger [26] that are single pixel devices, and CoreScan [4] which is the most well-known multi-pixel laboratory platform. Additionally, there are diverse models of hyperspectral cameras [26]-most of them push broom style scanners-that are multi-pixel devices, for which the companies SPECIM [27][28][29][30][31] and Headwall [32,33] have established the industry standard. The second milestone was the development of software packages for hyperspectral data analysis-such as ENVI [34], and the geological analysis-oriented application The Spectral Geologist (TSG) [35,36] developed by CSIRO-that use classical spectrography approaches and statistical proprietary unmixing technique developments (such as the iterated constrained endmembers method [8]) to perform semi-quantitative mineralogy on a single spectrum basis.…”
Section: Laboratory and Field Based Geological Hyperspectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one was the emergence of laboratory and field hyperspectral acquisition equipment, such as LabSpec [5][6][7], TerraSpec [24,25] and Hylogger [26] that are single pixel devices, and CoreScan [4] which is the most well-known multi-pixel laboratory platform. Additionally, there are diverse models of hyperspectral cameras [26]-most of them push broom style scanners-that are multi-pixel devices, for which the companies SPECIM [27][28][29][30][31] and Headwall [32,33] have established the industry standard. The second milestone was the development of software packages for hyperspectral data analysis-such as ENVI [34], and the geological analysis-oriented application The Spectral Geologist (TSG) [35,36] developed by CSIRO-that use classical spectrography approaches and statistical proprietary unmixing technique developments (such as the iterated constrained endmembers method [8]) to perform semi-quantitative mineralogy on a single spectrum basis.…”
Section: Laboratory and Field Based Geological Hyperspectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, popular computer vision algorithms were also tested in coregistration approaches [19]- [22]. SIFT (Scaleinvariant Feature Transform), SURF (Speeded Up Robust Features), FAST (Features from Accelerated Segment Test), and BRIEF (Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features) have been used to perform a robust feature detection of key points between adjacent frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIFT (Scaleinvariant Feature Transform), SURF (Speeded Up Robust Features), FAST (Features from Accelerated Segment Test), and BRIEF (Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features) have been used to perform a robust feature detection of key points between adjacent frames. To explore the most recent developments in different domains, Angel et al [22] proposed a fully automatic workflow to produce highly accurate georectified UAV-based hyperspectral mosaics collected by push-broom sensors, requiring a small number of GCPs. The Headwall Nano-Hyperspec push-broom sensor was used over two experimental crop sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high accuracy and precision (i.e., cm error) of results obtained for 2D (e.g., orthomosaics) and 3D (e.g., digital surface model-DSM) mapping, based on structure from motion with multiview stereo photogrammetry (SfM-MVS), is transforming most disciplines where studies need to characterize areas Drones 2020, 4, 13 2 of 26 up to~100 hectares [1,27,28]. In addition, more operationally demanding systems such as hyperspectral pushbroom sensors [22,29], thermal imagers [24] and LiDAR [30] are being implemented on UASs, providing new insights for data fusion and advanced data analysis [31]. Centimeter level accuracies are particularly important in these multi-sensor applications where spatial alignment of the different datasets is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%