2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9005491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated interpretability of linked data ontologies: : an evaluation within the cultural heritage domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semantically enriched representation of data or KGs adds meaning and context to data through ontologies and vocabularies that make it more easily understood and interpreted by humans and machines [25]. This leads to several benefits including improved data integration, data understanding, data interoperability, and faster discovery of knowledge via more powerful data querying and analysis [7,10,19]. We present the new release of the I4.0 KG dataset, comprising comprehensive semantic descriptions and values of the machine's processes involved in a single football production line.…”
Section: An Approach To Integrate the I40 Production Line Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantically enriched representation of data or KGs adds meaning and context to data through ontologies and vocabularies that make it more easily understood and interpreted by humans and machines [25]. This leads to several benefits including improved data integration, data understanding, data interoperability, and faster discovery of knowledge via more powerful data querying and analysis [7,10,19]. We present the new release of the I4.0 KG dataset, comprising comprehensive semantic descriptions and values of the machine's processes involved in a single football production line.…”
Section: An Approach To Integrate the I40 Production Line Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, a set of qualitative criteria usually considered to evaluate ontologies are described and five previous studies (from 1995 to 2007) proposing metrics to evaluate ontologies are compared in terms of this set of criteria. Concerning the cultural heritage domain, we found some studies that evaluate the usability of ontologies in this domain (Freire and de Valk, 2019;Freire and Proença, 2020). We also found a study to evaluate bibliographic ontologies analyzing their classes and properties (Biagetti, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic technologies, namely ontologies, have been gaining popularity in recent years due to their ability to specify and utilise relationships between entities and across domains and at large scales. On-tologies allow a better knowledge discovery, interpretability, transparency and traceability of data [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Moreover, semantic web technologies are based on open and interoperable standards such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) 5 for information representation, OWL (Web Ontology Language) 6 for representation of ontological modeling and SPARQL 7 for querying, and are extendable by design -making them suitable for application across use cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%