2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00651.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated red cell collection – quality and value

Abstract: Automated red cell collection was initially used largely for therapeutic purposes. New technology has rendered the procedure safer for donors and easier for machine operators. Optimal additive solution can be automatically added and the red cells filtered to provide a leucodepleted product. Two units of red cells may be collected during a single procedure from individuals who have a high enough red cell mass, whilst a single unit of red cells plus platelets or plasma can be collected from smaller donors. In vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include (i) efficiency, as more than one unit may be collected per procedure; (ii) safety, as a recipient may be given more than one unit from a single donor, thus reducing donor exposure and (iii) standardisation, as units have less variability in haemoglobin content compared with RCC prepared manually from whole blood (WB). The recent development of portable apheresis machines has added to these potential advantages by introducing the possibility of automated collections at mobile donation sessions, and these benefits have been comprehensively reviewed (Harrison, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include (i) efficiency, as more than one unit may be collected per procedure; (ii) safety, as a recipient may be given more than one unit from a single donor, thus reducing donor exposure and (iii) standardisation, as units have less variability in haemoglobin content compared with RCC prepared manually from whole blood (WB). The recent development of portable apheresis machines has added to these potential advantages by introducing the possibility of automated collections at mobile donation sessions, and these benefits have been comprehensively reviewed (Harrison, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 2RBC collections are more efficient, in that the proportion of RBC loss during preparation procedures is smaller than such loss after whole‐blood (WB) collection 10 . 2RBC units should thus offer clinicians greater quality and predictability in terms of the units they transfuse to patients 9,11 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non‐anaemic iron deficiency has been described in both blood and apheresis donors (Harrison, 2006; Page & Harrison, 2007). To our knowledge, this is the first documented report of cognitive impairment in such a donor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%