2020 31st Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/asmc49169.2020.9185253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Wafer Defect Classification using a Convolutional Neural Network Augmented with Distributed Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following article [27], the authors implemented a CNN designed by themselves to perform the task of defect detection and classification. This CNN was composed of three convolutional layers, one max pooling layer and two FC layers.…”
Section: Article By Article Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following article [27], the authors implemented a CNN designed by themselves to perform the task of defect detection and classification. This CNN was composed of three convolutional layers, one max pooling layer and two FC layers.…”
Section: Article By Article Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several DT algorithms such as regression tree, tree medium, and some ensemble methods such as random forest and bagged tree. As for SVMs, we have found one paper that uses a DT algorithm, concretely a random forest algorithm, to compare its accuracy with the principal method employed [27].…”
Section: Decision Trees (Dt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Automatic defect inspection that is accurate and reliable is key to reduce engineering time and manufacturing cost. Recently, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based approaches have shown promising results in defect localization and classification [1][2][3][4] . Most of these previous works either only classify an image as containing a defect of a certain type or predict the location of a defect in the form of a minimal bounding-box, which we term as defect detection, which generally ignores the precise geometry of the defect pattern itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other approach, the machines are trained with normal data in advance, and then, they find the parts that do not match the learned normal data from the data to inspect. 7 In applying the former approach to detecting IC pattern anomaly/defects from SEM inspected images, 8 it is difficult to obtain sufficient numbers of training data, because anomaly data required for training are extremely rare in general. Additionally, tiny defects/anomalies need to be filtered from the normal pattern background, which has extremely wide varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%