2009 10th Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services 2009
DOI: 10.1109/wiamis.2009.5031473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic adaptation decision making using an image to video adaptation tool in the MPEG-21 framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) to focus on the faces in the photo instead of the whole subjects in the image. This process is further explained in previous work [25].…”
Section: Increase In the Range Of Addressable Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) to focus on the faces in the photo instead of the whole subjects in the image. This process is further explained in previous work [25].…”
Section: Increase In the Range Of Addressable Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [24] we reported several experiments that make internal decisions in order to select optimal parameters settings that maximize the Quality of Service (AdaptationQoS tools), satisfying the constraints imposed by the terminal (UED tools) and the constraints of the content providers and content consumers (UCD tools). In another publication [25], we evaluated the automatic execution of sequences of conversions in which the Planner first decides on the input image format, the output visual stream format and the output frame size. In a second step, an ImagelVideo CAT uses Regions Of Interest (ROIs) descriptions stored in the Content DI to make additional internal decisions that focus on the adapted scene on the ROIs (e.g.…”
Section: Conversion Modules That Make Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It allows partially defining the behaviour of the conversions allowing thereby the use of optimisation methods inside component adaptation tools (CATs). CAIN-21 makes use of regions of interest (ROIs) to drive the Image2Video adaptation (Lopez et al, 2009b). CAIN-21 combines the two major decision-making methods and implements a complete algorithm, i.e., an algorithm that identifies all the feasible adaptations that produce content satisfying the usage environment constraints.…”
Section: Comparative Assessment Of Five Multimedia Adaptation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NinSuna provides semantic adaptation in the Scenes Of Interest (SOIs) selection and in the framerate reduction. CAIN-21 makes use of Regions of Interest (ROIs) to drive the Image2Video adaptation [29].…”
Section: Comparison With Others Multimedia Adaptation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%