1996
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming.

Abstract: The experiments in this article were conducted to observe the automatic activation of gender stereotypes and to assess theoretically specified conditions under which such stereotype priming may be moderated. Across 4 experiments, 3 patterns of data were observed: (a) evidence of stereotype priming under baseline conditions of intention and high cognitive constraints, (b) significant reduction of stereotype priming when a counterstereotype intention was formed even though cognitive constraints were high, and (c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
484
1
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(129 reference statements)
16
484
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Bias can be overt (explicit bias) or hidden and unconscious (implicit bias). [6][7][8][9] Implicit bias is often present even when explicit bias is absent. 10,11 Recent studies [12][13][14] show that clinicians are no different from the broader population, having substantial implicit bias against minority groups, even as they report little explicit bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias can be overt (explicit bias) or hidden and unconscious (implicit bias). [6][7][8][9] Implicit bias is often present even when explicit bias is absent. 10,11 Recent studies [12][13][14] show that clinicians are no different from the broader population, having substantial implicit bias against minority groups, even as they report little explicit bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the automatic, i.e., unintended, passive and unconscious, influence of stereotype priming on behavior, according to these authors. These and similar effects elicited by priming in the context of the automaticity (vs. control) of social constructs, as well as of social evaluations (see Section 3.5.2 below), have been abundantly reported (e.g., Aarts et al, 2005 Abbate et al, 2013;Blair & Banaji, 1996;Spruyt & Tibboel, 2015;Steele & Ambadi, 2006). …”
Section: Automatic Vs Controlled Processingmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Not only were the effects indeed stronger among the role-words, but there was no evidence for stereotype content and narrowness among the trait-words. This finding is surprising in light of research pointing to the ubiquity of each gender's association with particular traits (Blair & Banaji, 1996;Blair et al, 2001). There may have been yet another difference between our role-words and trait-words however.…”
Section: Gender Stereotypes and Semantic Meaning 19mentioning
confidence: 79%