2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of carbonate rocks permeability from 1H NMR relaxation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, two samples (122.45 and 187.95) had nearly the same porosity but showed a large difference in their permeability (to be discussed later). Figure 5 shows the pore size distributions as a function of the relaxation time using five size partitions as employed by Silva et al (2015). The curves show considerable heterogeneity among the samples, consistent with the variability in the permeability versus porosity relationships shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, two samples (122.45 and 187.95) had nearly the same porosity but showed a large difference in their permeability (to be discussed later). Figure 5 shows the pore size distributions as a function of the relaxation time using five size partitions as employed by Silva et al (2015). The curves show considerable heterogeneity among the samples, consistent with the variability in the permeability versus porosity relationships shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…4. The pore partitions of Silva et al (2015), consisted of micropores (T 2 values up to 1 ms), a transition from micropores and mesopores (from 1 to 10 ms), mesopores (10 to 100 ms), a transition from mesopores to macropores (100 to 1000 ms), and macropores (above 1000 ms). As indicated by Gonçalves et al (2017), it is not surprising that most partitions actually contributed to the flow process in our study The MICP measurements produced curves of the capillary pressure as a function of mercury saturation, from which pore size distributions could be extracted (Moctezuma Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity among the samples of each group was confirmed based on the shape of the T2 distributions and their logarithmic mean values T2LM (Table 1). The classification of pores was based on qualitative partitioning of the T2 distributions as used by Silva et al (2015). The heterogeneity of the samples is well evidenced by the variation of the pore families within the set, thus reinforcing the T2 partitioning ideas presented by Silva (2015): T2 up to 1 ms is considered to be micropores; between 1 and 10 ms is a transition region between micro and mesopores; from 10 to 100 ms consists of mesopores; from 100 to 1000 ms is a transition zone between meso and macropores, and over 1000 ms are macropores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of pores was based on qualitative partitioning of the T2 distributions as used by Silva et al (2015). The heterogeneity of the samples is well evidenced by the variation of the pore families within the set, thus reinforcing the T2 partitioning ideas presented by Silva (2015): T2 up to 1 ms is considered to be micropores; between 1 and 10 ms is a transition region between micro and mesopores; from 10 to 100 ms consists of mesopores; from 100 to 1000 ms is a transition zone between meso and macropores, and over 1000 ms are macropores. Figures 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a and 6a show the distributions of T2 for rock types RT1, RT2, RT3, RT4 and RT5, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os trabalhos de Flach (2012) e Japkowicz and Shah (2011) são indicados para aqueles que desejam se aprofundar no tema. Adicionalmente, para obter um exemplo de utilização da MC em um problema de classificação monorrótulo multiclasse, consulte [da Silva et al, 2015].…”
Section: Especificidade = Vn ÷ (Vn + Fp)unclassified