2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2754-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic identification of cited text spans: a multi-classifier approach over imbalanced dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, each base classifier can be regarded as an expert for a special sample in the classification space. Dynamic selection classifiers exhibit a higher accuracy over traditional combined approaches in solving several real-world problems, such as face recognition [ 30 ] and text verification [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, each base classifier can be regarded as an expert for a special sample in the classification space. Dynamic selection classifiers exhibit a higher accuracy over traditional combined approaches in solving several real-world problems, such as face recognition [ 30 ] and text verification [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies dealing with summary generation have shown that the language models are more beneficial than the baseline models such as MEAD and LexRank. The authors of these studies took into account linguistic patterns to generate summaries that are not just a combination of sentences (Ma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System generated summaries are needed because they contain 9 percentage points more related keywords from the original document than human abstractive summaries Ma et al (2018) Computational Linguistics 40 citing and cited papers set Similarity-based features are more suitable for summarisation than position-based features Yasunaga et al (2019) Computational Linguistics…”
Section: Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an appealing parallel research direction is the automatic identification of the citation discourse facet (i.e., task 1b). Most related works have adopted binary classifiers combining various latent features trained using Deep NLP techniques (e.g., Davoodi et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018). Other approaches have considered simpler word-or sentence-based relevance scores (e.g., Baruah et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018).…”
Section: Contributions To Cl-scisummmentioning
confidence: 99%