Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d18-1341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Post-Editing of Machine Translation: A Neural Programmer-Interpreter Approach

Abstract: Automated Post-Editing (PE) is the task of automatically correcting common and repetitive errors found in machine translation (MT) output. In this paper, we present a neural programmer-interpreter approach to this task, resembling the way that humans perform postediting using discrete edit operations, which we refer to as programs. Our model outperforms previous neural models for inducing PE programs on the WMT17 APE task for German-English up to +1 BLEU score and-0.7 TER scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-editing is also determined as the modification process of the machine translation output with a minimum labour effort rather than re-translation of the text. Automatic post-editing aims to correct the systematic and repetitive errors found in the output of machine translation [4]. In this concern, in another research, online automatic postediting system is introduced as trained on generic data and its exploiting user feedback to develop its performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-editing is also determined as the modification process of the machine translation output with a minimum labour effort rather than re-translation of the text. Automatic post-editing aims to correct the systematic and repetitive errors found in the output of machine translation [4]. In this concern, in another research, online automatic postediting system is introduced as trained on generic data and its exploiting user feedback to develop its performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPI is adopted in text editing to predict tags, such as KEEP, DELETE, and INSERT, and execute operations during decoding simultaneously. NPI-based methods have achieved state-of-the-art results in long-to-short (Dong et al, 2019;Gu et al, 2019), and mixed editing (Vu and Haffari, 2018). Nevertheless, like other Tagging methods, NPI's encoder hidden states are not updated during editing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COPYNET (Gu et al, 2016;Zhao et al, 2019): the multi-source Transformer equipped with CopyNet (see Figure 2(a)). (Vu and Haffari, 2018): a neural programmer-interpreter approach. We implemented COPYNET also on top of THUMT (Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%