2009 International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cso.2009.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Target Recognition Based on Rough Set-Support Vector Machine in SAR Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these conventional methods are limited in their ability to handle the complex nature of SAR backscattering signals and the variability of environmental conditions, leading to reduced accuracy and robustness for ship classification in SAR images [5]. Machine learning algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forests (RF) have been applied to automatically classify ships in SAR images with high accuracy [6]- [8]. Some studies have also explored the use of hybrid approaches that combine multiple machine learning algorithms for ship classification, such as feature selection followed by SVM classification [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these conventional methods are limited in their ability to handle the complex nature of SAR backscattering signals and the variability of environmental conditions, leading to reduced accuracy and robustness for ship classification in SAR images [5]. Machine learning algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forests (RF) have been applied to automatically classify ships in SAR images with high accuracy [6]- [8]. Some studies have also explored the use of hybrid approaches that combine multiple machine learning algorithms for ship classification, such as feature selection followed by SVM classification [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very large number of ATR algorithms have been proposed in recent decades [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Some have been based primarily on the computation of certain types of features, such as PCA [ 8 ], edge and corner descriptors [ 9 ], wavelets [ 10 ] or deformable templates [ 11 ], while others have been driven more by a particular classification scheme, e.g., neural networks [ 12 ], support vector machines (SVM) [ 13 ] or sparse representations [ 14 ]. In the closely-related fields of computer vision and visual tracking, there have been significant developments in object detection and recognition based on visual features, including the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) [ 15 , 16 ], the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [ 17 ], spin images [ 18 ], patch features [ 19 ], shape contexts [ 20 ], optical flow [ 21 ] and local binary patterns [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%