2009 Joint IEEE North-East Workshop on Circuits and Systems and TAISA Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/newcas.2009.5290420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic verification methodology based on structural test patterns

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order, to demonstrate that the extracted constraints are useful for avoiding the false error detection in our simulation-based verification approach [4], we run simulations on the VHDL models and their respective SystemC golden model, using the generated patterns. Despite the difference in the styling codes between the two models, no false errors were detected with constraints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order, to demonstrate that the extracted constraints are useful for avoiding the false error detection in our simulation-based verification approach [4], we run simulations on the VHDL models and their respective SystemC golden model, using the generated patterns. Despite the difference in the styling codes between the two models, no false errors were detected with constraints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a simulation-based verification approach using structural (ATPG) test patterns has been proposed [4]: This approach can also be affected by ISes. Indeed, if the golden (SystemC) model and the design under verification (VHDL) model use different styling codes, forcing an invalid state will make the two models behave differently and an error will be flagged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%