2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00791.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autumn growth of Elytrigia repens, Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis at high latitudes in an outdoor pot experiment

Abstract: Autumn growth of weeds (i) provides an opportunity for mechanical and chemical control in autumn and (ii) can be important for weed survival and infestation in the following spring. Growth characteristics of Elytrigia repens, Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis in autumn were studied in 2004 and 2005, on plants of different origins and developmental stages (planted at various times from May to August). The plants were grown outdoors in large pots and were assessed during September and October each year. The s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insignificant or varying responses of C. arvense to shallow post-harvest cultivations or cover-crop growing have also been observed in other studies (e.g., Brandsaeter et al, 2011;Melander et al, 2012). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) infer that post-harvest measures against C. arvense populations showing little or varying readiness of adventive buds on roots to sprout in late summer and autumn would have a limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes it difficult to exhaust the carbohydrate reserves in the roots. The rather intensive handpulling of C. arvense in this study is another aspect likely to have masked any effects of the post-harvest treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Insignificant or varying responses of C. arvense to shallow post-harvest cultivations or cover-crop growing have also been observed in other studies (e.g., Brandsaeter et al, 2011;Melander et al, 2012). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) infer that post-harvest measures against C. arvense populations showing little or varying readiness of adventive buds on roots to sprout in late summer and autumn would have a limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes it difficult to exhaust the carbohydrate reserves in the roots. The rather intensive handpulling of C. arvense in this study is another aspect likely to have masked any effects of the post-harvest treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This is probably due to the higher presence of C. arvense and T. farfara, as opposed to E. repens, in experiment 2. The two dicotyledonous perennials are known to grow less readily in late summer and autumn than E. repens (Brandsaeter et al, 2010;Tørresen et al, 2010). Depleting the carbohydrates in the roots of C. arvense and rhizomes of T. farfara is probably less pronounced as compared to E. repens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. arvense is sensitive to deep tillage whilst the effect of shallow cultivations may vary (Brandsaeter et al, 2011a(Brandsaeter et al, , 2011bOlsen, 2011). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) inferred that cultivations against perennials with low readiness of buds to sprout in late summer and autumn (e.g. S. arvensis) would have limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes exhaustion of the carbohydrate reserves in the roots impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory findings on the success of E. repens in organic cropping over time have been reported by Becker and Hurle (1998), who demonstrated decreased frequency of E. repens, whereas Riesinger and Hyvönen (2006b) found increased abundances as a function of the duration of organic farming. In general, E. repens is probably going to benefit from climate change, which could extend its period of autumn growth (Tørresen et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%