2015
DOI: 10.9771/cmbio.v13i3.12940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da fase inicial do reparo ósseo após implantação de biomateriais

Abstract: <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: ">Introdução:</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: "> Dentre os biomateriais à base de fosfato de cálcio utilizados como substitutos ósseos, a hidroxiapatita (HA) e biovidro (BV) são bastantes promissores devido à sua biocompatibilidade, união química ao o sso natural e possuir propriedades osteocondutivas. <strong>Objet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates that the scaffolds have physical-chemical characteristics, topography, 3D architecture and porosity favorable to tissue neoformation, as proposed by Karageorgiou and Kaplan [7] and Tumedei, Savadori and Del Fabbro [1] and demonstrated in previous studies [23,32,33]. Furthermore, throughout the experiment, these scaffolds were not encapsulated, unlike the studies that evaluated particulate or microsphere biomaterials [29,[38][39][40][41]. Encapsulation would cause the scaffolds to have limited regenerative potential, with the formation of fibrosis surrounding biomaterials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This demonstrates that the scaffolds have physical-chemical characteristics, topography, 3D architecture and porosity favorable to tissue neoformation, as proposed by Karageorgiou and Kaplan [7] and Tumedei, Savadori and Del Fabbro [1] and demonstrated in previous studies [23,32,33]. Furthermore, throughout the experiment, these scaffolds were not encapsulated, unlike the studies that evaluated particulate or microsphere biomaterials [29,[38][39][40][41]. Encapsulation would cause the scaffolds to have limited regenerative potential, with the formation of fibrosis surrounding biomaterials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this condition, tissue repair occurs through fibrosis with reduced thickness due to the absence of 3D scaffold, essential to regeneration [2]. In this study, no control group with bone defect was used without implantation of the scaffold, in consonance with the principles of the 3R's (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) and with results established in the literature [35][36][37] and found by our group [2,29,38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%