2001
DOI: 10.1021/jp003284i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoided Curve Crossing between the A1 and B1 States in CF2Br2 Photolysis at 234 and 265 nm

Abstract: The photodissociation dynamics of CF2Br2 has been studied using a two-dimensional photofragment ion image technique for the two excitation wavelengths 234 and 265 nm. At 234 nm, three dissociation channels, i.e., the radical CF2Br + Br (2P J ) (J = 1/2, 3/2), the three-body CF2 + 2Br (2P J ) (J = 1/2, 3/2), and the molecular elimination channel CF2 + Br2, were observed with quantum yields of 0.84, 0.15, and trace, respectively. The difference between β (CF2Br + Br (2P3/2)) = 0.65 and β (CF2Br + Br (2P1/2)) = 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the b parameter of Cl à is larger than that of Cl, it is anticipated that the contribution of the A 00 state to the former channel is more effective. Absorption via more than one PES and curve crossings were suggested to account for the observed branching ratios and the anisotropies in other halocarbons as well, exemplified by CH 3 I [2], CH 3 Cl and CHD 2 Cl [15,16], CHFCl 2 [24,25], CH 3 CFCl 2 [28], CH 2 BrCl [18], CF 2 Br 2 [19], and CH 2 I 2 [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the b parameter of Cl à is larger than that of Cl, it is anticipated that the contribution of the A 00 state to the former channel is more effective. Absorption via more than one PES and curve crossings were suggested to account for the observed branching ratios and the anisotropies in other halocarbons as well, exemplified by CH 3 I [2], CH 3 Cl and CHD 2 Cl [15,16], CHFCl 2 [24,25], CH 3 CFCl 2 [28], CH 2 BrCl [18], CF 2 Br 2 [19], and CH 2 I 2 [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous theoretical and experimental investigations on monohalogen alkyl molecules [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] have revealed the importance of non-adiabatic curve crossing dynamics in C-X (X ¼ Cl, Br, and I) bond rupture and in generation of ground state X( 2 P 3=2 ) [X] and spin-orbit excited X( 2 P 1=2 ) [X Ã ]. Fewer studies have been performed on dihalide alkyl molecules [7,[17][18][19][20], since the presence of two C-X bonds makes the structure of the electronically excited states and therefore of the UV absorption spectra more complex. Besides, the picture is further complicated by the greater number of potential dissociation pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 At wavelengths below 260 nm, the nascent CF 2 Br radical spontaneously dissociates, producing CF 2 and a second Br atom. 8,11,21 Recent experiments have also indicated a small ͑0.04 quantum yield͒ contribution from a direct Br 2 elimination channel. 5 Consistent with these observations, we find very weak CF 2 Br absorptions following 240 nm photolysis of matrix isolated samples ͑Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Matrix and Gas-phase Photochemistry Of Cf 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was first shown for photolysis at 193 nm in a molecular beam by Huber and co-workers. 17 Later, in ion imaging experiments, Park et al 8 reported a "trace" amount of Br 2 photoproduct following excitation at 234 nm. More recently, Lin and co-workers 5 probed Br 2 directly using cavity ring down spectroscopy, and reported a quantum yield of 0.04 for the molecular channel at 248 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results suggest that the molecular Br 2 elimination reaction, CF 2 Br 2 → CF 2 + Br 2 , cannot occur under their experiment condition. Park et al [14] have studied the photodissociation dynamics of CF 2 Br 2 using 2D ion image technique. The difference of parameter β between channel (CF 2 Br + Br ( 2 P 3/2 )) and (CF 2 Br + Br ( 2 P 1/2 )) at 234 nm suggests that excited A 1 and B 1 states are strongly correlated by avoided curve crossing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%