2018
DOI: 10.15358/0344-1369-2018-2-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding Pitfalls in Experimental Research in Marketing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When testing the effects of experimental factors, PROCESS is considered preferable to SEM (Hayes et al., 2017). Using an experimental factor as the independent variable fails a primary assumption of SEM—that independent variables are continuous (Spilski et al., 2018). PROCESS accounts for the use of categorical and dichotomous variables as independent variables (Hayes, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When testing the effects of experimental factors, PROCESS is considered preferable to SEM (Hayes et al., 2017). Using an experimental factor as the independent variable fails a primary assumption of SEM—that independent variables are continuous (Spilski et al., 2018). PROCESS accounts for the use of categorical and dichotomous variables as independent variables (Hayes, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were also asked about their CC experience before they were randomly assigned to the experimental groups (see A socio-demographics and CC habits). This sampling ensures internal validity (Spilski et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Experiments On Consumer’s Moral Judgment In CC Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also considered several control variables that have been found to be important in the context, such as age, education, income, and personality, such as routine seeking, emotional stability, and need for security (measured according to Costa and McCrae 1992;Rammstedt and John 2005). None of the variables correlated significantly and higher than r = .20 with the dependent variables (Spilski et al 2018) of our hypotheses H1-H4, neither in study 1 nor in study 2. Therefore, these variables did not need to be included as covariates in the analyses (Meyvis and Van Osselaer 2018).…”
Section: Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%