2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Back azimuth constrained double-difference seismic location and tomography for downhole microseismic monitoring

Abstract: We have developed a new seismic tomography method, back azimuth constrained double-difference (DD) seismic tomography, which is suitable for downhole microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing. The new method simultaneously locates microseismic events and determines three-dimensional (3D) Vp and Vs models for the fracturing zone using

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a shows that the earthquakes are generally within the low V p and V s zones. Based on the results of laboratory test (Christensen, 1989) and real case study (Chen et al, 2017), we speculate that the infiltration of high-pressure fluids into the fault zones is the cause of the velocity reduction. It can be seen that the V p /V s ratio in the earthquake source regions (i.e., 1.608-1.626) is about 6-7% lower than the background value of 1.73.…”
Section: Geophysical Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 2a shows that the earthquakes are generally within the low V p and V s zones. Based on the results of laboratory test (Christensen, 1989) and real case study (Chen et al, 2017), we speculate that the infiltration of high-pressure fluids into the fault zones is the cause of the velocity reduction. It can be seen that the V p /V s ratio in the earthquake source regions (i.e., 1.608-1.626) is about 6-7% lower than the background value of 1.73.…”
Section: Geophysical Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We apply the new reverse‐time imaging method to a downhole microseismic data set to characterize potential fractures and impedance interfaces in the proximity of the microseismic events. This downhole microseismic data set is from a shale gas HF treatment (Chen et al, ). The target shale formation is located at about 2,400 m in depth, and in total 15 stages of HF are performed.…”
Section: Application To a Downhole Field Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the trajectories of fracturing well and monitoring well, as well as the locations of treatment stages and borehole geophones. Chen et al () determined accurate microseismic locations for Stages 10–13 and inverted for the velocity model by the back‐azimuth constrained double‐difference location and tomography method. At 2.432 km in depth, there is an obvious low‐velocity anomaly to the southwest of the monitoring well (Figure a), which is likely caused by the existence of fluids and fractures.…”
Section: Application To a Downhole Field Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to surface monitoring, the obvious advantage of downhole microseismic monitoring is that the detection is nearer the reservoir leading to a high S/N ratio, many more P and S waves, etc. for determining accurate event locations (Song et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2017;Hawthorne and Ampuero, 2017). Fig.…”
Section: Microseismic Monitoring Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%