1990
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870030099017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Antigens and Neutrophil Granule Proteins in Middle Ear Effusions

Abstract: Otitis media with effusion is a significant cause of hearing loss in young children. We hypothesized that persistent bacterial antigens in middle ear effusions (MEEs) might act as chronic inflammatory stimuli causing release of neutrophil proteins. Concentrations of neutrophil lactoferrin and a 37-kd cationic bactericidal protein (CAP 37) were measured in 47 MEEs collected from 27 children at the time of tympanostomy tube placement. Antigens of Streptococcus pneumoniae were detected by latex particle agglutina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…mRNA was extracted from the frozen middle ear samples using Dynabeads oligo(dT) 25 (Dynal A.S, Oslo, Norway) as specified by the manufacturer. After the mRNAs were eluted from the beads, they were reverse transcribed with the Superscript preamplification system for first-strand cDNA synthesis (Gibco BRL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…mRNA was extracted from the frozen middle ear samples using Dynabeads oligo(dT) 25 (Dynal A.S, Oslo, Norway) as specified by the manufacturer. After the mRNAs were eluted from the beads, they were reverse transcribed with the Superscript preamplification system for first-strand cDNA synthesis (Gibco BRL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although AOM is usually treated as a single entity, both human and experimental-animal studies suggest that there are differences in host responses depending on the organism involved (14,19,26). There are indications that H. influenzae antigens evoke a greater local inflammatory response than pneumococcal antigens do (25). Pneumococcal infection, on the other hand, is clinically more severe and involves a higher risk of serious disease and intracranial complications (4,29,32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other rapid tests for pneumococcal antigen detection have been marketed, the NOW test has several distinct advantages. Unlike other tests such as countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis or latex agglutination, which utilize multiple capsular polysaccharide antigens, the NOW test uses a single cell wall polysaccharide that is present on all clinical strains of S. pneumoniae (6,7). This enables the NOW test to detect all isolates of S. pneumoniae rather than the more common types tested for by the countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis and latex agglutination kits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences between control and patients with OME are indicated by *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ***(p < 0.001), respectively; ns = not significant. compared to allergic asthma, and this would again emphasize the multifactorial characteristics of OME [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%