2012
DOI: 10.1128/aem.07559-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Degradation Genes in the Oligotrophic North Pacific Subtropical Gyre

Abstract: ABSTRACTDimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) is an organic sulfur compound that is rapidly metabolized by marine bacteria either by cleavage to dimethylsulfide (DMS) or demethylation to 3-methiolpropionate. The abundance and diversity of genes encoding bacterial DMS production (dddP) and demethylation (dmdA) were measured in the North Pacific subtropical gyre (NPSG) between May 2008 and February 2009 at Station ALOHA (22°45′N, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…dmdA transcripts were B14-fold more abundant than dddP transcripts (5.8 Â 10 5 versus 5.1 Â 10 4 l À 1 ; Figure 1), a difference that may indicate higher inventories of DmdA compared with DddP in the protein pool of HTCC2255 cells, or may reflect different half-lives of the transcripts or proteins. In any case, it is consistent with earlier comparisons of DMSP gene transcripts in seawater (Levine et al, 2012;Varaljay et al, 2012). Although different in absolute numbers, transcript abundances (Figure 1b; R ¼ 0.96) and expression ratios (Supplementary Figure S3A) showed similar patterns for the two genes and were significantly correlated at the beginning (September 28-30) and end of the deployment (October 20-27).…”
Section: Roseobacter Htcc2255 Dmsp Genes In Monterey Baysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…dmdA transcripts were B14-fold more abundant than dddP transcripts (5.8 Â 10 5 versus 5.1 Â 10 4 l À 1 ; Figure 1), a difference that may indicate higher inventories of DmdA compared with DddP in the protein pool of HTCC2255 cells, or may reflect different half-lives of the transcripts or proteins. In any case, it is consistent with earlier comparisons of DMSP gene transcripts in seawater (Levine et al, 2012;Varaljay et al, 2012). Although different in absolute numbers, transcript abundances (Figure 1b; R ¼ 0.96) and expression ratios (Supplementary Figure S3A) showed similar patterns for the two genes and were significantly correlated at the beginning (September 28-30) and end of the deployment (October 20-27).…”
Section: Roseobacter Htcc2255 Dmsp Genes In Monterey Baysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The average relative abundance of dddP genes obtained in this study (10%) was about two times higher than the values in the GOS metagenomic data (8,12) and, also, about three times higher than the values that were shown in the stations ALOHA and BATS (17,18). The relatively high values (ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These studies showed that the temporal variability in the abundance of DMSP degradation genes in the Sargasso Sea (18) and the North Pacific Ocean (17) was strongly influenced by seasonal changes in primary production, UV radiation, and depth-related environmental parameters, such as particulate DMSP (DMSPp) and DMS concentrations (17,18,26). However, their findings were limited to a …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DMSP acts as a specific chemical cue that attracts motile and chemotactic bacteria, including roseobacters (86). The fact that the Roseobacter clade is only one of two marine bacterial lineages harboring both of the known pathways for DMSP degradation (the other being the SAR116 clade) (87) suggests that this compound may be a particularly important currency in Roseobacter-phytoplankton interactions (75). Finally, polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs) produced mainly by diatoms may selectively inhibit Roseobacter members, with evidence for poor growth in the presence of PUAs for strains related to Roseobacter litoralis and Phaeobacter gallaeciensis (88).…”
Section: Roseobacter-phytoplankton Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%