2000
DOI: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5524-5526.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Gene System as Containment Control in Yeast Cells

Abstract: The potential of a bacterial toxin-antitoxin gene system for use in containment control in eukaryotes was explored. The Escherichia coli relE and relB genes were expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Expression of the relE gene was highly toxic to yeast cells. However, expression of the relB gene counteracted the effect of relE to some extent, suggesting that toxin-antitoxin interaction also occurs in S. cerevisiae. Thus, bacterial toxin-antitoxin gene systems also have potential applications in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve this, compounds that could disrupt the interactions between a toxin and its cognate antitoxin could be very useful as antibacterials: an unbalanced synthesis of each independent TAS triggers cell growth arrest or, for prolonged periods of time, cell death, with a survival rate of 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 to 10 Ϫ7 per each TA pair (127). Thus, it is conceivable that the employment of two independent toxins would potentiate such cell death, and indeed, TAS have been used in the design of tools for the biological containment of strains designed for bioremediation and other industrial purposes (87,123,127).…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectives: Use Of Tas As Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, compounds that could disrupt the interactions between a toxin and its cognate antitoxin could be very useful as antibacterials: an unbalanced synthesis of each independent TAS triggers cell growth arrest or, for prolonged periods of time, cell death, with a survival rate of 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 to 10 Ϫ7 per each TA pair (127). Thus, it is conceivable that the employment of two independent toxins would potentiate such cell death, and indeed, TAS have been used in the design of tools for the biological containment of strains designed for bioremediation and other industrial purposes (87,123,127).…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectives: Use Of Tas As Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eukaryotic pair could have originated independently, and furthermore, there is little sequence conservation among RNA targeting toxins although their general structure is conserved. Interestingly, expression of bacterial RelE in yeast restricts cell growth (Kristoffersen et al 2000) and RelE expression in mammalian cell lines can induce apoptosis (Yamamoto et al 2002), suggesting that RelE targets the translating eukaryotic ribosome and cleaves its mRNA as in Bacteria and Archae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, Kid was found to be also toxic in eukaryotic cells, since uncoupled production of Kid and Kis triggered apoptosis in human cells and regulated cell proliferation in yeast and metazoa (9). Moreover, the chpIK system of the spirochete Leptospira interrogans, a close homologue of the E. coli parD system, was reported to be active in yeast (31), while the RelE toxin encoded by the heterologous TA system relBE of E. coli was shown to inhibit cell growth in yeast (24) and to induce apoptosis in human cells (39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%