2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-019-01749-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterium-incorporated fly ash geopolymer: a high-performance, thermo-stable cement alternative for future construction material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, at 56 and 90 days, the rate of strength increment declined to 4.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Several studies have reported similar increases in the strength of concretes (5–30%) prepared with different EM percentages [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, at 56 and 90 days, the rate of strength increment declined to 4.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Several studies have reported similar increases in the strength of concretes (5–30%) prepared with different EM percentages [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This has been verified by the conductance of microstructural investigation over the self-healed products. Chatterjee et al (2019) reported the formation of calcite and gehlenite compounds due to the bacterial action by bacillus subtillus inside fly ash based GPC mortar. Studies by Jadhav et al (2018) over meta- kaolin based GPC were also found to be in accordance with the observed behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jonkers (2011) reported that bacteria that exist in the matrix act as a catalyst and transform the precursor compound to filler material and fills the crack. Bacterial strain used in the concrete varies as Bacillus Pasteurii, Sporosarcina Pasteurii, Bacillus Subtillis, Bacillus Sphaericus, Bacillus Licheniformis and Bacillus Thuringiensis (Andalib et al 2015;Wulandari et al 2018;Jadhav et al 2018;Chatterjee et al 2019;Seifan et al 2019;Morsali et al 2019;Ganesh et al 2019). Extensive studies have been concentrated on the application of a single type of bacterial strain inside cementations matrix and only a few focuses on co-culturing of two bacteria inside geopolymer matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capillary penetration of water in the metakaolin based BMGP specimen decreased by 75% when compared with that of control mix [30]. The water absorption (WA), acid, sulphate and chloride attack resistance improved with the incorporation of bacillus subtilis in fly ash based GPC, which is attributed to the decrease in pore size with the incorporation of bacteria in the geopolymer system [28].…”
Section: Studies Focussed On Durability Performance and Microstructur...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The CS, STS and FS of BMGP have been reported as 40.65 MPa, 2.21 MPa and 7.65 MPa, respectively [34]. An increase of 44% CS with the incorporation of Bacillus Subtilis in fly ash based BMGP [28].…”
Section: Studies Focussed On the Type Of Bacteria Used In Bmgpmentioning
confidence: 99%