2006
DOI: 10.1163/156939606777488842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced Milstein Methods for Ordinary SDEs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are schemes based on implicit time-stepping integrators, see for example Alfonsi [3], Kahl and Schurz [44] and Dereich, Neuenkirch and Szpruch [19]. Other time-discretization approaches involve splitting the drift and diffusion vector fields and evaluating their separate flows (sometimes exactly) before they are recomposed together, typically using the Strang ansatz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are schemes based on implicit time-stepping integrators, see for example Alfonsi [3], Kahl and Schurz [44] and Dereich, Neuenkirch and Szpruch [19]. Other time-discretization approaches involve splitting the drift and diffusion vector fields and evaluating their separate flows (sometimes exactly) before they are recomposed together, typically using the Strang ansatz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discretization schemes with strong rates (which is important for the multilevel method presented later) given the Feller condition (or even stronger conditions) have been shown in [1,3,7,19] and [39]. Recently, Hutzenthaler et al [37] have proven a strong rate under the condition that 0.5σ 2 < 2κθ .…”
Section: Discretization Schemes For Sdesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…we can not use a semi discrete method. If we want to produce a boundary preserving numerical scheme then these sdes (that we should fully discretize) can be approximated by balanced Milstein methods (see [14], [15], [16] and [2]).…”
Section: Summary and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%