2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ballistic performance of hybrid 3D woven composites: Experiments and simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A powerful exploitation of tomographic approaches is threedimensional digital volume correlation [334,335] where microscale changes are characterized over the loading history. Micro-scale in situ validation using tomographic approaches have been investigated for cellular materials (both metallic and polymeric) [330,331,336], metals [337], and woven composites [338,339], just to name a few. Such image-based multiscale validation techniques with co-designed simulations will provide further confidence in physics simulation codes and advance the ICME paradigm (see Section 1).…”
Section: Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful exploitation of tomographic approaches is threedimensional digital volume correlation [334,335] where microscale changes are characterized over the loading history. Micro-scale in situ validation using tomographic approaches have been investigated for cellular materials (both metallic and polymeric) [330,331,336], metals [337], and woven composites [338,339], just to name a few. Such image-based multiscale validation techniques with co-designed simulations will provide further confidence in physics simulation codes and advance the ICME paradigm (see Section 1).…”
Section: Verification Validation and Uncertainty Quantification In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber failures can also be modeled by cohesive elements. In a series of articles, Bouvet et al [199,[232][233][234] use cohesive elements to High velocity impact [201,275,372,373] Soft impact [202,[254][255][256] Crushing tube [203,326] Crushing plate [349,350] Energy absorbing structures [338,339,374] predict both intraply and interlaminar damage during low velocity impacts. This approach was also used to study the compression after impact behavior of laminates [235].…”
Section: Low Velocity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which can typically highlight delamination damage, generally with no real distinction of other types [25,29,30]. The second is X-ray computed tomography (CT), which provides full volumetric analysis revealing damage modes such as delamination and other main energy-dissipating intra ply mechanisms [31][32][33][34]. The volumes reconstructed with CT can be analysed to define many other typical impact features such as cone cracking [5,10].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%