2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(17)30691-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barrett's Esophagus is Associated with an Altered Oral Microbiome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in patients with GERD, patients with BE have a distinct microbiome composition [47]. Type II microbiomes, as described earlier, are associated with progression of GERD to BE [48].…”
Section: Role Of the Microbiome In Bementioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in patients with GERD, patients with BE have a distinct microbiome composition [47]. Type II microbiomes, as described earlier, are associated with progression of GERD to BE [48].…”
Section: Role Of the Microbiome In Bementioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, a recent study found a distinct oral microbiome that is associated with presence of BE. 47 This case-control study analyzed the oral microbiome using a three-taxon model, Lautropia, Streptococcus, and unspecified genus in the order of Bacteroidales and distinguished the microflora of patients with BE from healthy individuals. This model of clustering predicted patients with BE with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 88%.…”
Section: Role Of the Microbiome In Bementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the prediction of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma, the AUC values predicted by seven biomarkers such as Rothia, Haemophilus and Capnocytophaga of oral microbiota could even reach 90%-100% [39]. In the prediction of Barrett's esophagus, the accuracy of using Lautropia, Streptococcus and Enterobacteriaceae was 94% [40]. Obviously, the markers mentioned in the above diseases were not exactly the same as the microbes used in this study for GDM classification, which ensures the specificity of our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the prediction of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma, the AUC values predicted by seven biomarkers such as Rothia, Haemophilus and Capnocytophaga of oral microbiota could even reach 90%-100% [39]. In the prediction of Barrett's esophagus, the accuracy of using Lautropia, Streptococcus and Enterobacteriaceae was 94% [40]. Obviously, the markers mentioned in the above diseases were not exactly the same as the microbes used in this study for GDM classification, which ensures the specificity of our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%