1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.1995.tb00090.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basin geofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1987; Tucker & Wright 1990). Formation waters are here defined as waters initially trapped during sedimentation that changed their composition during basin evolution due to diagenetic reactions (after Lawrence & Cornford 1995). The molar ratios of Sr/Ca of the uppermost brackish host‐rock are characteristic of being precipitated from formation waters, whereas the molar ratios of Ca/Fe indicate the influence of meteoric waters; the molar ratios of Mg/Ca indicate either precipitation from meteoric or formation waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1987; Tucker & Wright 1990). Formation waters are here defined as waters initially trapped during sedimentation that changed their composition during basin evolution due to diagenetic reactions (after Lawrence & Cornford 1995). The molar ratios of Sr/Ca of the uppermost brackish host‐rock are characteristic of being precipitated from formation waters, whereas the molar ratios of Ca/Fe indicate the influence of meteoric waters; the molar ratios of Mg/Ca indicate either precipitation from meteoric or formation waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molar ratios of Sr ⁄ Ca and Ca ⁄ Fe of the host marine limestone are consistent with precipitation from formation waters whereas the molar ratios of Mg ⁄ Ca are consistent with precipitation from either meteoric or formation waters (Table 2; Skougstad & Horr 1963;Kinsman 1969;McIntire 1963;Tucker & Howson et al 1987;Tucker & Wright 1990). Formation waters are here defined as waters initially trapped during sedimentation that changed their composition during basin evolution due to diagenetic reactions (after Lawrence & Cornford 1995). The molar ratios of Sr ⁄ Ca of the uppermost brackish hostrock are characteristic of being precipitated from formation waters, whereas the molar ratios of Ca ⁄ Fe indicate the influence of meteoric waters; the molar ratios of Mg ⁄ Ca indicate either precipitation from meteoric or formation waters.…”
Section: Diagenesis Of the Host-limestonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing upon paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, structural geologic, and geochemical studies of the remagnetization which affected the Appalachian region of North America during the late Paleozoic time, we conclude with speculations on the process of remagnetization of the Paleozoic strata of Bolivia. ,-86.9øN, 273.5øE, A95 = 3.0 ø' 30 Ma,-80.5øN, 287.3øE, A95 = 2.7ø; 50 Ma,-78.9øN, 307.0øE, A95 = 4.3 ø' 60 Ma, -80.5øN, 340.7øE, A95 = 4.2ø; 80 Ma, -78.9øN, 3.0øE, A95 = 3.1 ø' 130 Ma,-83.8øN, 60.3øE, A95 = 4.3 been driven by either a "squeegee" effect of the developing thrust belt [Oliver, 1986] or in response to a gravitationally driven hydraulic gradient [Garven and Freeze, 1984;Lawrence and Cornford, 1995]. The synfolding remagnetization of Paleozoic strata over large areas of Bolivia during Andean deformation could have followed a similar sequence of processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion from the paleomagnetic data that remagnetization occurred when the beds were only 20% deformed is explained by a ChRM which remained stable during subsequent fold and thrust deformation. This stability is likely if orogenic fluid composition did not change dramatically during subsequent deformation [Lawrence and Cornford, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metamorphism will lead to the release of fluids by devolatization, with processes such as dehydration, decarbonation and desulphidation producing H,O + CO, + H,S fluids of low salinity (Phillips et al 1994;Lawrence & Cornford 1995). High fluid pressures at depth may have driven a sufficiently large fluid flux to provide a source of ore-fluid from which the Rio Tinto massive sulphides could have been deposited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%