2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With growing concerns regarding the security, reliability, and affordability of energy, the idea of sharing electricity generated by DRES is gaining popularity with scientists, policymakers, and communities alike [50]. Sharing of battery storage energy as compared to split distribution has proven to be a cost effective and viable solution in community scale systems such as high self-consumption, self-sufficiency, and cost savings to prosumers [51][52][53]. There are multiple reasons for this: first, large storage systems could easily participate in power markets.…”
Section: Shared Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With growing concerns regarding the security, reliability, and affordability of energy, the idea of sharing electricity generated by DRES is gaining popularity with scientists, policymakers, and communities alike [50]. Sharing of battery storage energy as compared to split distribution has proven to be a cost effective and viable solution in community scale systems such as high self-consumption, self-sufficiency, and cost savings to prosumers [51][52][53]. There are multiple reasons for this: first, large storage systems could easily participate in power markets.…”
Section: Shared Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any unused electricity generation due to lower than expected demand will be exported to the grid ensuring the battery storage is full. It is necessary here to use the PV to charge the battery, otherwise the expected increase in self-sufficiency from grid charging and BESS discharging will be lost [51]. For the purpose of monitoring the data from SEM, submetering based on pulse meters were added to configurations as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Case Study: Wgvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed modified I-V droop method controls power contributions from individual households such that each household contributes according to the capacity and the state of charge of its battery. To effectively coordinate distributed storage resources, many recent studies have adopted the concept of peer-to-peer (P2P) trading to develop optimization models to determine optimal schedules of ESSs and trading decisions, such as [36]- [38]. The authors in [38] investigated the optimal ESS operation and sizing problem in a P2P energy trading network under two different ESS ownership structures: user owned structure and a third party energy sharing provider (ESP) owned structure.…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively coordinate distributed storage resources, many recent studies have adopted the concept of peer-to-peer (P2P) trading to develop optimization models to determine optimal schedules of ESSs and trading decisions, such as [36]- [38]. The authors in [38] investigated the optimal ESS operation and sizing problem in a P2P energy trading network under two different ESS ownership structures: user owned structure and a third party energy sharing provider (ESP) owned structure. The comparison of economic benefit between the two structures shows that the ESP owned model achieves a smaller energy cost saving owing to the fact that the benefits are split between the users and the ESP, but requires less investment on a smaller ESS, compared to the user owned ESS structure.…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The whole life cycle technical and economical study of energy storage is carried out. Some researchers use the financial analysis method of net present value (NPV) [20], investment payback period [21], and other indicators to study this problem. Some scholars use the methods of life cycle cost of storage (LCCOS) and leveled cost of energy (LCOE) [22] and cost-benefit analysis [23] to analyze and evaluate the economic performance of energy storage in a long time scale from the perspective of investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%