SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bauschinger Effect Response of Automotive Sheet Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Point D is the reverse yield starting point which represents the compressive yield strength when the material starts to unload at point C. In Mroz model, it assumes that the elastic region is constant and represented by the initial yield stress. This is contradictory to what was observed in real material compression testing [10]. Thus when the material starts to unload at higher strength, lower compressive yield strength is obtained.…”
Section: Figure 2 Uniaxial Stress-strain Curves In Mroz Modelcontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Point D is the reverse yield starting point which represents the compressive yield strength when the material starts to unload at point C. In Mroz model, it assumes that the elastic region is constant and represented by the initial yield stress. This is contradictory to what was observed in real material compression testing [10]. Thus when the material starts to unload at higher strength, lower compressive yield strength is obtained.…”
Section: Figure 2 Uniaxial Stress-strain Curves In Mroz Modelcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…[10] found that the amount of Bauschinger effect actually depends on the hardening magnitude before the loading is reversed. In fact there are no extra parameters needed to fit the model.…”
Section: Figure 1 Illustration Of Bauschinger Effectmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sample was first strained to a forward strain to achieve a forward stress and then compressed until the point of buckling. The reverse yield stress is found using a 0.2% offset strain [58][59][60] and it is much smaller than , indicating a pronounced Bauschinger effect. The Bauschinger effect can be quantified by the back stress which is defined as = ( − | |)/2 [50,51,61].…”
Section: Bauschinger Effect Studied Using Tension-compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The magnitude of depends on the choice of the reverse strain offset in determining [20][21][22]. In this work, we used an offset of 0.2% which is commonly found in the literature of steels [23][24][25][26]. For each tempering condition, several forward strains were chosen and the maximum forward strain was set approximately 0.5% to 1% below the uniform elongation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%