2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian-based preference prediction in bilateral multi-issue negotiation between intelligent agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this study, we can notice that only some approaches have focused on negotiation in the cloud context such as References During negotiations, and especially in competitive negotiation environments, information about agent preferences may not be revealed and shared publicly. For this reason, different methods are proposed in the literature that can predict the preferences of opponents such as prediction based on genetic algorithms, 9 prediction based on Bayes' theorem 4 and prediction based on the machine learning. 10 However, these methods have certain limitations, such as the need for prior knowledge to formulate hypotheses on the opponent's preferences in the case of the prediction based on Bayes' theorem and the need for several learning steps before giving effective results in the case of the prediction based on genetic algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this study, we can notice that only some approaches have focused on negotiation in the cloud context such as References During negotiations, and especially in competitive negotiation environments, information about agent preferences may not be revealed and shared publicly. For this reason, different methods are proposed in the literature that can predict the preferences of opponents such as prediction based on genetic algorithms, 9 prediction based on Bayes' theorem 4 and prediction based on the machine learning. 10 However, these methods have certain limitations, such as the need for prior knowledge to formulate hypotheses on the opponent's preferences in the case of the prediction based on Bayes' theorem and the need for several learning steps before giving effective results in the case of the prediction based on genetic algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work on learning in negotiation has focused significantly on learning the characteristics of the opponent agents. Hindriks et al [20], Buffett and Spencer [9], Yu et al [56], Zhang et al [58], Li and Cao [29], and Zeng and Sycara [52,57] propose methods that build on Bayesian learning to estimate the opponent's preferences. A similar method is used by Ren and Anumba [44], and Zhang et al [59] to learn the opponent's acceptance strategy by estimating the reservation value from previous negotiations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better promote the agent's self-adaptive negotiation ability, an army of scholars have begun to introduce machine learning into the negotiation. Bayesian Learning estimates the probability distribution of opponent negotiation parameters and preferences and adaptively adjusts the concession strategy [13]. Q-Learning generates the optimal negotiation strategy by calculating the utility cumulative value [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error between the predictive utility value in round t+1 and actual utility value in round t can be calculated by coordinating equations (12) and (13). While Δ +1, > 0, the utility of concession has not been maximized; it will increase.…”
Section: Concessional Learning Based On Dynamic Selectivementioning
confidence: 99%