2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20072150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Inversion for Geoacoustic Parameters in Shallow Sea

Abstract: Geoacoustic parameter inversion is a crucial issue in underwater acoustic research for shallow sea environments and has increasingly become popular in the recent past. This paper investigates the geoacoustic parameters in a shallow sea environment using a single-receiver geoacoustic inversion method based on Bayesian theory. In this context, the seabed is regarded as an elastic medium, the acoustic pressure at different positions under low-frequency is chosen as the study object, and the theoretical prediction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sound pressure TL calculation formula is given by Equation ( 13 In Figure 3, the dotted lines are calculated results by FEM, and the solid lines are the results by three comparison acoustic field simulation methods. Based on their applicability, the fast field method (Scotter program) [17,25,26] and the parabolic equation method (RAM program) [26,27] are used to examine the error of FEM for the models in Figure 2ac, respectively. The comparison results in Figure 3 show that the TL curves that were simulated by FEM are highly consistent with the results obtained by the existing simulation programs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound pressure TL calculation formula is given by Equation ( 13 In Figure 3, the dotted lines are calculated results by FEM, and the solid lines are the results by three comparison acoustic field simulation methods. Based on their applicability, the fast field method (Scotter program) [17,25,26] and the parabolic equation method (RAM program) [26,27] are used to examine the error of FEM for the models in Figure 2ac, respectively. The comparison results in Figure 3 show that the TL curves that were simulated by FEM are highly consistent with the results obtained by the existing simulation programs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the input layer receives simulated sound pressure data, denoted as "p," which includes a set of sound pressure data p j (r i , z i ), where the range of i extends from 1 to I. The number of neurons in the hidden layer is set at 9, and this choice is influenced by various factors, one of which is the empirical rule for parameter a, which is set to a = -15 in this context (Zheng et al, 2021). Furthermore, the number of neurons in the output layer, represented as "l," is determined based on the number of geophysical parameters that need to be inverted.…”
Section: Bpnn Inversion Model Of Geoacoustic Parameters Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MHS results do not depend on the initial model, the accuracy of the inversion results can be improved by selecting the correct initial value. In this study, the MAP estimate searched by the OSA was used as the initial model for the MHS (Zheng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Nonlinear Bayesian Inversion Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%