2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian methodology incorporating expert judgment for ranking countermeasure effectiveness under uncertainty: Example applied to at grade railroad crossings in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pawlovich et al (2006) employed a Bayesian approach to assess impacts of road design measures on crash frequencies and rates. And Washington and Oh (2006) developed a Bayesian methodology for incorporating expert judgment in ranking countermeasure effectiveness under uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pawlovich et al (2006) employed a Bayesian approach to assess impacts of road design measures on crash frequencies and rates. And Washington and Oh (2006) developed a Bayesian methodology for incorporating expert judgment in ranking countermeasure effectiveness under uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed approach is similar to that suggested by El Faouzi (2006), Melcher et al (2001) and Washington and Oh (2006), but different in how prior knowledge and data likelihood functions are developed.…”
Section: Bayesian Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The next steps, defining criteria for usability/risk thresholds (2) and generating ideas for improved usability/risk control (3), are undertaken with different instruments, according to different clauses of IEC 62366 (for usability engineering) and ISO 14971 (for risk management), but with the same goal of simulating (4) and evaluating (5) the new degree of usability respectively the new residual risk after implementation of design improvements/countermeasures. The last elements of each iteration loop in IEC 62366 as well as ISO 14971, include identification (6) and evaluation (7) of new usability problems or risks, arising from implemented modifications of the foregoing steps as well, as a decision on whether to start a new iteration or interrupt and end with the usability and risk management procedure (8). Comparing the two processes, it becomes clear that UE is a means of the risk management process.…”
Section: Usability Engineering and Risk Management Processmentioning
confidence: 99%