2000
DOI: 10.21236/ada458817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Multidimensional Scaling and Choice of Dimension

Abstract: Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in practice, we can let the chain wander through the ((q À 1)*s) À 1 dimensional hyperplane and postprocess the results by flipping the signs of each configuration in the chain back to a target configuration. This approach is very similar to that advocated by Bradlow and Schmittlein (2000), Oh and Raftery (2001), Hoff, Raftery, and Handcock (2002), and Gormley and Murphy (2006). For small similarities problems, we found that in addition to the origin and one fixed coordinate, simply adding three sign constraints to the three fixed coordinates isolated a single posterior.…”
Section: Multidimensional Bayesian Similarities/dissimilarites Scalingsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in practice, we can let the chain wander through the ((q À 1)*s) À 1 dimensional hyperplane and postprocess the results by flipping the signs of each configuration in the chain back to a target configuration. This approach is very similar to that advocated by Bradlow and Schmittlein (2000), Oh and Raftery (2001), Hoff, Raftery, and Handcock (2002), and Gormley and Murphy (2006). For small similarities problems, we found that in addition to the origin and one fixed coordinate, simply adding three sign constraints to the three fixed coordinates isolated a single posterior.…”
Section: Multidimensional Bayesian Similarities/dissimilarites Scalingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Other researchers have used the truncated normal (Oh and Raftery 2001), the normal (Navarro and Lee 2003), and the normal with an exponential mean (Okada and Shigemasu 2010). We prefer the log-normal because we think it is a more realistic model of the noise process; namely, the smaller the observed distance, the smaller the variance of that distance.…”
Section: Multidimensional Bayesian Similarities/dissimilarites Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of our initial goals is to find an optimal projection of the high-dimensional distance matrix H into this lower dimensional space. We conduct this projection using Bayesian multidimensional scaling (BMDS) ( Oh and Raftery, 2001 ) in which we construct a probabilistic model to quantify the fit of a particular configuration of cartographic locations to the observed matrix of serological measurements. Typically, P = 2, but higher or lower dimensions may better reflect the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tim Futing Liao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1296-7660 Notes 1. In a similar tradition, Oh and Raftery (2001) adapted BIC for assessing dimension choice in multidimensional scaling. 2.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. In a similar tradition, Oh and Raftery (2001) adapted BIC for assessing dimension choice in multidimensional scaling. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%