2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005wr003971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian neural network for rainfall‐runoff modeling

Abstract: 1] In this paper, a Bayesian learning approach is introduced to train a multilayer feedforward network for daily river flow and reservoir inflow simulation in a cold region river basin in Canada. In Bayesian approach, uncertainty about the relationship between inputs and outputs is initially taken care of by an assumed prior distribution of parameters (weights and biases). This prior distribution is updated to posterior distribution using a likelihood function following Bayes' theorem while data are observed. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive review of the potentiality of ANNs in hydrological modeling was given, for example, by the ASCE Task Committee (2000b) and by Maier and Dandy (2000). In the majority of the applications of river flow prediction, the networks are fed by both past flows and past precipitation observations: extremely encouraging results have been obtained in literature on both real and synthetic rainfall-runoff data (among the many others, in the recent years: Cameron et al, 2002;Solomatine and Dulal, 2003;Jain et al, 2004;Khan and Coulibaly, 2006;Shamseldin et al, 2007;Srivastav et al, 2007). Despite the importance of calibration information in a data-driven technique, little attention has been paid, so far, to the influence that the calibration period has on the forecasting performances of ANN rainfall-runoff modeling.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network For Streamflow Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An extensive review of the potentiality of ANNs in hydrological modeling was given, for example, by the ASCE Task Committee (2000b) and by Maier and Dandy (2000). In the majority of the applications of river flow prediction, the networks are fed by both past flows and past precipitation observations: extremely encouraging results have been obtained in literature on both real and synthetic rainfall-runoff data (among the many others, in the recent years: Cameron et al, 2002;Solomatine and Dulal, 2003;Jain et al, 2004;Khan and Coulibaly, 2006;Shamseldin et al, 2007;Srivastav et al, 2007). Despite the importance of calibration information in a data-driven technique, little attention has been paid, so far, to the influence that the calibration period has on the forecasting performances of ANN rainfall-runoff modeling.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network For Streamflow Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the denominator P (s) in the above equation is inflexible, a direct inference of a posteriori P (w|s) is impossible. The probability distribution of outputs following the rules of conditional probability for a given input vector x can be given in the form (Bishop 1995; Khan and Coulibaly, 2006),…”
Section: Developing the Bnn Algorithm For Temperature Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the Bayes' rule, a posteriori probability distribution for the weights P (w|s) can be given as follow (Bishop, 1995;Khan and Coulibaly, 2006),…”
Section: Developing the Bnn Algorithm For Temperature Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Bayes' rule, a posteriori probability distribution for the weights, say P (w|s) can be given as (Bishop, 1995;Khan and Coulibaly, 2006),…”
Section: Bayesian Neural Network Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%