2004
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2004.826698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BCI Competition 2003—Data Set IIb: Support Vector Machines for the P300 Speller Paradigm

Abstract: We propose an approach to analyze data from the P300 speller paradigm using the machine-learning technique support vector machines. In a conservative classification scheme, we found the correct solution after five repetitions. While the classification within the competition is designed for offline analysis, our approach is also well-suited for a real-world online solution: It is fast, requires only 10 electrode positions and demands only a small amount of preprocessing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
236
0
17

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
236
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…These bit rates are comparable with previous online studies conducted with healthy participants (13.3 bits/ min; Serby et al, 2005) or healthy participants and wheelchair bound but otherwise healthy adults (5.5 bits/min; Donchin et al, 2000) 1 . Several previous P300-based BCI studies have presented bit rate with the time between characters selections removed (e.g., Donchin, et al, 2000;Kaper et al, 2004;Meinicke et al, 2002;Serby et al, 2005); therefore, we have presented it both ways. However, it seems that the appropriate way to report bit rate would be to include the necessary and actual time between character selections.…”
Section: Bit Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bit rates are comparable with previous online studies conducted with healthy participants (13.3 bits/ min; Serby et al, 2005) or healthy participants and wheelchair bound but otherwise healthy adults (5.5 bits/min; Donchin et al, 2000) 1 . Several previous P300-based BCI studies have presented bit rate with the time between characters selections removed (e.g., Donchin, et al, 2000;Kaper et al, 2004;Meinicke et al, 2002;Serby et al, 2005); therefore, we have presented it both ways. However, it seems that the appropriate way to report bit rate would be to include the necessary and actual time between character selections.…”
Section: Bit Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter comments probably apply to P300 BCIs as well, since they also rely on selective attention. Although P300 BCIs are considered independent 3 , this assumption has been questioned (Allison, 2003;Kaper et al, 2004).…”
Section: 1: Display Type and Gaze Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of feature extraction and classification procedures such as stepwise linear discriminate analysis (SWLDA) [6] [17], wavelets [5], support vector machines [11][13] [23], and matched filtering [19] have been implemented, improving the performance beyond that originally reported in [9]. Based on multiple studies in healthy volunteers [6][17] [19], and initial studies in persons with physical disability [25], the P300 speller has potential to serve as an effective communication device for persons who have lost or are losing the ability to write and speak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%