2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing fault diagnosis based on an improved morphological filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ⊕ denotes the dilation operator, Θ denotes the erosion operator, ∘ stands for the opening operator, and • stands for the closing operator. Besides, several main morphological filters [13] are introduced as follows: Morphological gradient (MG):…”
Section: Basic Theory Of Mathematical Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ⊕ denotes the dilation operator, Θ denotes the erosion operator, ∘ stands for the opening operator, and • stands for the closing operator. Besides, several main morphological filters [13] are introduced as follows: Morphological gradient (MG):…”
Section: Basic Theory Of Mathematical Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the aforementioned four basic operators, some advanced cascading and combining operations can be implemented. For example, Hu et al [13] applied the morphological gradient (MG) operator to bearing fault diagnosis successfully. Also, Li et al [14] used MG to propose weight multiscale morphological filtering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lv et al [ 13 ] introduced average a combination difference morphological filter for feature extraction, where the scale selection of structural elements (SEs) is determined by the Teager energy kurtosis (TEK). Hu et al [ 14 ] proposed a new improved MF algorithm to overcome the deficiency of conventional MFs which can be easily interfered with. In [ 15 ], a combination of a MF and translation-invariant wavelet decomposition was employed to augment ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and to improve de-noising reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They paid much attention to the relationship between the SE length and the filtering effect, and also suggested that the length was around 0.6 times the pulse repetition period. Hu et al [13] used the morphological gradient (MG) operator to pick up both positive and negative impulses from vibration signals successfully. Dong et al [14] put forward the average operator (AVG) for the impulse components extraction, and the length of SE was determined by an indicator called signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%