2005
DOI: 10.22323/2.04040301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beautiful guides. The value of explainers in science communication

Abstract: During the last annual conference of ECSITE (European Collaborative for Science and Technology Exhibitions; Helsinki, June 2005), for the first time two discussion sessions were devoted to explainers, the innumerable people – young students mainly – who welcome visitors at exhibitions, museums and festivals, who animate laboratories and science shows, who guide, explain and lately also stimulate and manage discussions and participatory procedures. Thanks to the involvement of the speakers, who agreed to submit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed efforts to reform and streamline the sector include providing professional development to educate and re-skill its workforce (DCMS 2005). Furthermore, in Europe, and more specifically in science museums, the educators who directly engage with visitors are among the lowest paid and undervalued in their institutions, while their job responsibilities continue to increase (Rodari and Xanthoudaki 2005). These accounts suggest that while this field has been in existence for many decades, and despite the efforts of the International Council of Museums (ICOM) to raise the profile and recognition of museum educators (Boylan 1987;Brüninghaus-Knubel 1993), educators' professional work and status remain tenuous and, as a consequence, the educational potential of museums will be curtailed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed efforts to reform and streamline the sector include providing professional development to educate and re-skill its workforce (DCMS 2005). Furthermore, in Europe, and more specifically in science museums, the educators who directly engage with visitors are among the lowest paid and undervalued in their institutions, while their job responsibilities continue to increase (Rodari and Xanthoudaki 2005). These accounts suggest that while this field has been in existence for many decades, and despite the efforts of the International Council of Museums (ICOM) to raise the profile and recognition of museum educators (Boylan 1987;Brüninghaus-Knubel 1993), educators' professional work and status remain tenuous and, as a consequence, the educational potential of museums will be curtailed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Scientists themselves also acknowledge a need for encouragement, guidance, and skills development in communicating their research. 5 Explainers working within science centres and museums -the facilitators of the visitor's experience 12 are on the interface of science and society. Explainers in science centres and museums represent a very important group with key public-facing responsibilities.…”
Section: Trainees -A Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, science centres and museums provide training for their explainers, although the programmes differ significantly from one institution or country to another. 12 Obviously, training needs vary in different situations and even for different individuals, 16 nevertheless further strategic direction regarding training for researchers and explainers is clearly required. At present, however, very little is publicly known about the impact of individual training on scientists or explainers.…”
Section: Trainees -A Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the increased number of scientific and cultural institutions, the demand for professionals, including explainers, to work there also increased. Their main task is to facilitate visitors' experience by encouraging them to actively engage in and think about the exhibition [Rodari and Xanthoudaki, 2005].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%