2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior monitoring under uncertainty using Bayesian surprise and optimal action selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also common to find some reference values related to normal, hyper and hypoglycemia ranges in order to establish good rewards and penalties. However, we found that only five papers include the actions taken in the reward function [31,32,38,42,44]. We think it could be interesting to also consider the insulin doses in the reward function, which for example can lead to take less aggressive actions for the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also common to find some reference values related to normal, hyper and hypoglycemia ranges in order to establish good rewards and penalties. However, we found that only five papers include the actions taken in the reward function [31,32,38,42,44]. We think it could be interesting to also consider the insulin doses in the reward function, which for example can lead to take less aggressive actions for the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this research is compared to other multiagent systems [43], then artificial intelligence systems (Bayesian network and expert system) are totally integrated in agents, thereby forming the fundamental part of behavior operation (to monitor the environment or to act over it). In fact, agents have no defined behavior, but their actions and monitoring tasks are always dependent on these artificial intelligence systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…case a new specification should be recommended to the patient, it will be based a characterization of its own BG profiles (Avila & Martínez, 2014). Such profiles are obtained by employing a subcutaneous glycemic sensor, considering that the patient metabolism is stabilized at the moment of the measures.…”
Section: Predicting Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%