2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of mixed formulation of metalaxyl and dimethomorph in grape and soil under field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of an n>1-order exponential model did not show a significant improvement (data not shown), which is consistent with other field studies (e.g., Pasarella et al, 2009;Liang et al, 2012). Several authors have reported a higher dissipation rate in the field during the first week after application, followed by a slow dissipation rate during the second or third weeks for table and wine grapes (Cabras et al, 2001;Mandal et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2012). However, in this study, dissipation rates were stable during the entire study period (approximately six weeks).…”
Section: Pesticide Grape Berry Dissipationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The use of an n>1-order exponential model did not show a significant improvement (data not shown), which is consistent with other field studies (e.g., Pasarella et al, 2009;Liang et al, 2012). Several authors have reported a higher dissipation rate in the field during the first week after application, followed by a slow dissipation rate during the second or third weeks for table and wine grapes (Cabras et al, 2001;Mandal et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2012). However, in this study, dissipation rates were stable during the entire study period (approximately six weeks).…”
Section: Pesticide Grape Berry Dissipationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…DT 50 values ranged between 16 and 23 days, whereas DT 90 values ranged between 52 and 76 days (Table 2). Our DT 50 values are somewhat lower than the average value of 46 days reported by the PPDB (2016) for the field dissipation of metalaxyl, but within the range of 9 and 70 days observed in different field studies where metalaxyl was applied to unamended and organically-amended soils (Kookana et al, 1995;Liu et al, 2012;Triantafyllidis et al, 2013). The enhanced persistence of metalaxyl in the top 0-5 cm soil layer after amending the soil with clay was most likely a consequence of the higher sorption exerted by the amendment (Table 1), which reduced not only the leaching of the fungicide to deeper soil layers, but also its bioavailability to be degraded, as suggested by other authors for organically-amended soils (Fernandes et al, 2006;Rodríguez-Cruz et al, 2012) and supported by the results of the enantioselective study presented in the next section.…”
Section: Fungicide Persistence and Leachingcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The half‐life of metalaxyl was observed to be 1.3 and 0.4 days in tomato at single and double the application rate respectively . It has been shown that metalaxyl dissipates faster in grape (half‐life value 4.9 days) than in soil (half‐life value 8.7 days) . The R ‐form of metalaxyl dissipated more rapidly, with half‐life values of 2.8, 3.7 and 2.4 days in cucumber, cabbage and spinach respectively .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To optimise the mass conditions, the reference standard of metalaxyl was directly infused in the mobile phase to the Triple‐Quad for confirmative conditions in MRM mode. The precursor ion of metalaxyl in electrospray ionisation (ESI+) mode was m / z 280 [M + H] + . The fragmentor voltage for metalaxyl was 90 V. The MRM transitions of the fungicide were m / z 280 → 220 (collision energy 5 V), 280 → 160 (collision energy 20 V).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation