This paper discusses the differences between Si-face and C-face MOS interfaces in 4H-SiC MOSFETs. The two interfaces exhibit unique electrical characteristics, which will be linked with the differences in interface defects. We carried out an electrically detected magnetic resonance (EDMR) study on Si-face and C-face 4H-SiC MOSFETs, and found that there are different types and different amounts of interface defects on each interface. We discussed the EDMR results in comparison with the electrical characteristics of Si-face and C-face MOSFETs.
SiC MOS Interfaces: Si face vs. C faceSilicon carbide is a promising wide-band-gap semiconductor for high-performance (highvoltage and high-temperature operational, low-energy-loss, and high-energy-density) power electronics. The main devices of SiC will be Schottky barrier diodes (SBD) and metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) on 4H-SiC wafers. Both the devices expectedly have wide applications in power electronics. Currently, the SBD devices have been practically commercialized, but the MOSFETs still have some barriers for a mass commercialization. The major barriers are caused by the quality of SiC MOS interfaces. From a structural view point, SiC-SiO 2 interfaces are similar to the wellknown Si-SiO 2 interface, as discussed in our earlier paper [1]. However, from an electrical view point, SiC MOS interfaces are much inferior to those of silicon. The important issues in 4H-SiC MOSFETs are (1) a serious degradation of the channel mobility (field-effect mobility, µ FE ), (2) a lower stability of the threshold voltage (V th ), and (3) a lower reliability of gate dielectric layers, as compared to the case of silicon. Such properties are strongly dependent not only on MOS processes [oxidation and postoxidation anneal (POA), etc.] but also on the type of initial surfaces. In 4H-SiC wafers, typical surfaces are 4H-SiC(0001) (Si face) and 4H-SiC(0001 _