2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural response towards twelve feedstuffs in lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the results described for DMI, there was higher acceptability by the animals of the diet without peach palm meal, indicating that there was feed selection with the rejection of the peach palm meal by the lambs. It is possible that the increase in the total unsaturated fatty acid contents with the replacement of maize by peach palm meal affected the palatability, due to possible rancidification of the peach palm meal [5,6,47] and the presence of phenolic compounds [16,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the results described for DMI, there was higher acceptability by the animals of the diet without peach palm meal, indicating that there was feed selection with the rejection of the peach palm meal by the lambs. It is possible that the increase in the total unsaturated fatty acid contents with the replacement of maize by peach palm meal affected the palatability, due to possible rancidification of the peach palm meal [5,6,47] and the presence of phenolic compounds [16,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palatability, which is influenced by taste, smell, texture, nutrients, or toxins (Quaranta et al, 2006), can initially determine preference for an ingredient. However, the postingestive effects of a palatable feed could lead to changes in degree of preference (Provenza, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used to evaluate the preference of animal for diets and feed palatability was adapted from Walker (1994) and Quaranta et al (2006). The palatability test lasted eight days, four for adaptation of animals to facilities and management, and four days for data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%