2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behind the scenes: Unpacking student discussion and critical reflection in lectures

Abstract: His main research interests are formative assessment, digital learning and doctoral education. Jens Breivik is associate professor in education. His area of research is teaching and learning in higher education. His background is in scholarship of teaching and learning in HE and philosophy of education. He has a particular interest in analysis of students' critical thinking and argumentation skills. He is a member of the research group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these types of assessments create opportunities for students to regularly share their thinking with teachers and peers (Ludvigsen, Krumsvik & Breivik, 2020;Smith et al, 2011) with limited additional workload for the teacher during the assessment (de Sousa, 2018;Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). A deeper understanding of students' behavior and thought processes when using digital formative assessments with SRS throws light upon which relationships between these aspects affect metacognition.…”
Section: A Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these types of assessments create opportunities for students to regularly share their thinking with teachers and peers (Ludvigsen, Krumsvik & Breivik, 2020;Smith et al, 2011) with limited additional workload for the teacher during the assessment (de Sousa, 2018;Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). A deeper understanding of students' behavior and thought processes when using digital formative assessments with SRS throws light upon which relationships between these aspects affect metacognition.…”
Section: A Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further layer of coding was needed to capture the nature of shifts made or attempted between episodes. In another study by Ludvigsen, Krumsvik, and Breivik (2020), three SEDA codes (alone) were used to operationalise exploratory talk when analysing peer discussions among undergraduate students.…”
Section: Design For Adaptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%