Beitrag zur Morphologie und Körperlichen Jugendentwicklung des Springtamarin Callimico Goeldii (Thomas, 1904)

Lorenz, Rainer; Heinemann, Heidrun

doi:10.1159/000155064

Cited by 19 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Goeldi's monkeys (Callimico goeldii) are reported to finish weaning at 112 days of age (Carroll, 1982), to begin weaning at 14-21 days of age but continue to suckle frequently up to 92 days (Jurke and Pryce, 1994), and to have a nursing period that lasts ca. 60-70 days (Lorenz and Heinemann, 1967). When considering this species, Opie et al (2013a) use a number that is 2 weeks shorter than the longest reported weaning age.…”

Section: Concerns About Data Quality and Comparabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Of Apples and Oranges? The Evolution of “Monogamy” in Non-human Primates

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Behavioral ecologists, evolutionary biologists, and anthropologists have been long fascinated by the existence of "monogamy" in the animal kingdom. Multiple studies have explored the factors underlying its evolution and maintenance, sometimes with contradicting and contentious conclusions. These studies have been plagued by a persistent use of fuzzy terminology that often leads to researchers comparing "apples with oranges" (e.g., comparing a grouping pattern or social organization with a sexual or genetic mating system). In this review, we provide an overview of research on "monogamy" in mammals generally and primates in particular, and we discuss a number of problems that complicate comparative attempts to understand this issue. We first highlight why the muddled terminology has hindered our understanding of both a rare social organization and a rare mating system. Then, following a short overview of the main hypotheses explaining the evolution of pair-living and sexual monogamy, we critically discuss various claims about the principal drivers of "monogamy" that have been made in several recent comparative studies. We stress the importance of using only high quality and comparable data. We then propose that a productive way to frame and dissect the different components of pair-living and sexual or genetic monogamy is by considering the behavioral and evolutionary implications of those components from the perspectives of all participants in a species' social system. In particular, we highlight the importance of integrating the perspective of "floater" individuals and considering their impacts on local operational sex ratios, competition, and variance in reproductive success across a population. We stress that pair-living need not imply a reduced importance of intrasexual mate competition, a situation that may have implications for the sexual selection potential that have not yet been fully explored. Finally, we note that there is no reason to assume that different taxa and lineages, even within the same radiation, should follow the same pathway to or share a unifying evolutionary explanation for "monogamy". The study of the evolution of pair-living, sexual monogamy, and genetic monogamy remains a challenging and exciting area of research.

show abstract

Section: Concerns About Data Quality and Comparabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Of Apples and Oranges? The Evolution of “Monogamy” in Non-human Primates

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Drüsenfelder in der posterioren Abdominalregion und in der Sternalregion finden sich bei allen Genera der Hapalidae und bei Callimico goeldii [16,26,27,31,38]. Histologische Untersuchungen an O.spixi zeigen apokrine und holokrine Drüsen in der Circumanal-, Perineal-, Genital-und Pubisregion, die erst mit beginnender Ge schlechtsreife sezernieren und beim 9 grösser und zahlreicher sind als beim $ [56] H.jacchus zeigt mit 26 Tagen die ersten Markierbewegungen, die Jungtiere streifen, wie Erwachsene, die Genitalien auf der Unterlage ab.…”

Section: Duftmarkierenunclassified

Vergleichende Untersuchungen Über Sexual- und Sozialverhalten der Krallenaffen (Hapalidae)

Epple¹

1967

IJFP

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Patterns of infant development and ontogenetic trajectories in Callimico are similar to those of callitrichids and differ from those of other New World monkeys [Garber & Leigh, 1997;Martin, 1992]. Furthermore, C. goeldii resembles Callitrichidae in that it has claws or tegulae on all digits except the hallux [Fleagle, 1999;Ford, 1986], has a relatively small body [Encarnación & Heymann, 1998;Lorenz & Heinemann, 1967], exhibits cooperative infant caregiving, and has a high reproductive output (females are capable of giving birth twice a year) [Garber & Leigh, 1997]. However, this species also shares traits with the Cebidae in that it has a third molar (albeit reduced in size and lacking a distinct hypocone) and produces single offspring [Ford, 1986;Martin, 1992].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While various aspects of Callimico gross anatomy [Hershkovitz, 1977;Hill, 1959;Lorenz & Heinemann, 1967], ecology [Christen & Geissmann, 1994;Ferrari et al, 1999;Masataka, 1981a,b;Porter, 2000], behavior [Porter, 2001;Schradin & Anzenberger, 2001, 2003, and genetics (for references see above) have been documented, details about the skeletal development of C. goeldii are lacking. Morphological comparisons of newborns might reveal similarities that are not apparent in adults, because the skeletons of adults become more specialized during development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic evaluation of neonatal skeletal development inCallimico goeldiireveals closer similarity toCallithrix jacchusthan toSaguinus oedipus

Hofmann

Schradin

Geissmann

2006

American J Primatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phylogenetic affinities of the neotropical Goeldi's monkey (Callimico goeldii) have long been a matter of debate. Whereas most morphological evidence appears to place Callimico in a sister group position relative to the Callitrichidae, genetic studies place C. goeldii within the Callitrichidae and suggest that it is more closely related to marmosets than to tamarins. The present study presents the first radiographic analysis comparing the secondary limb bone ossification of newborn C. goeldii with representatives of the marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). The state of secondary ossification of the epiphysis and short bones is classified into three different ontogenetic stages. Our results reveal that in terms of the number of ossification centers, C. goeldii is significantly closer to C. jacchus than to S. oedipus. This is the first morphological study to support the findings of molecular studies, and the results suggest that C. goeldii is more closely related to marmosets than to tamarins.

show abstract

Beitrag zur Morphologie und Körperlichen Jugendentwicklung des Springtamarin Callimico Goeldii (Thomas, 1904)

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Of Apples and Oranges? The Evolution of “Monogamy” in Non-human Primates

Of Apples and Oranges? The Evolution of “Monogamy” in Non-human Primates

Vergleichende Untersuchungen Über Sexual- und Sozialverhalten der Krallenaffen (Hapalidae)

Radiographic evaluation of neonatal skeletal development inCallimico goeldiireveals closer similarity toCallithrix jacchusthan toSaguinus oedipus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About